[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
Commenti sui recenti fatti americani
- Subject: Commenti sui recenti fatti americani
- From: "Alberto L'Abate" <labate at unifi.it>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:45:06 +0200
Cari amici vi mando alcuni commenti sulla tragedia americana che mi hanno fatto riflettere e che vanno contro l'esaltazione militaristica e revanscista occidentale. Questi fatti mi hanno fatto venire in mente una frase di Gandhi che diceva che il miglior modo di difendersi è quello di non avere nemici. Purtroppo l'occidente, con la propria politica di potenza, e con il mantenimento di quella violenza strutturale di cui parla il gruppo di Torino, di nemici se ne crea ogni giorno sempre di più. E la reazione che la Nato sta programmando, se la politica dell'occidente non cambia, e non prende in considerazione quando scritto dal "Guardian" che "la migliore difesa è la giustizia", rischia di peggiorare sempre più la situazione. E' forse venuto il momento di una forte risposta di tutti i gruppi e le organizzazioni che credono nella nonviolenza , e che pensano che la via della pace è nella giustizia. Ma manca da parte nostra una strategia valida e vincente. Perché non cerchiamo di lavorarci? Cordiali saluti Alberto 1) The best defence is justice Special report: Terrorism in the US Martin Woollacott Wednesday September 12, 2001 The Guardian We live in one world. There are moments when we know this is so for the best of reasons and moments when we know it for the worst of reasons. This disorder and the anger which goes with it have reached America from whatever source. Equally, The attacks on the World Trade towers and on the Pentagon and other American targets are a terrible proof that disorder in the world cannot be fenced off. New York's police commissioner called it "a war zone" and many others followed him in that description. The truth in that sad banality is not simply that the casualties are as grave as on many a battlefield, or that the organisation of these attacks was, alas, like that of a highly efficient military operation. It is also that in a number of places in the world, including the United States itself, as Oklahoma City showed, there are groups who consider themselves at war with America. It is true that their number is small. The list of possible culprits is short. The world is not full of people who want to kill Americans. But there is a potentially deadly combination of literally suicidal audacity, recruitment from among alienated youth, modern means of destruction, and the inattention of governments who are either incompetent at controlling terrorist groups or who look the other way for political reasons. We can add to that the cover which diasporas in both North America and Europe can provide for terrorists, largely by allowing them to remain anonymous and untraceable. This is the combination that has almost certainly brought this tragedy upon us. We have seen it before on a lesser scale. But a terrorist success of this size is something new. It could be emulated in other continents. It could be emulated with chemical or biological weapons - the Tokyo subway attack was a warning of that possibility - or with nuclear weapons. The irony is that America's sense that it is vulnerable to rogue attack, which its allies sometimes decry, has been shown to be correct. But, at the same time the instruments which American governments, and especially this one, have been preparing to remedy that vulnerability are shown to be either inadequate or irrelevant. Extraordinary long-range aerial military capacity, the ability to strike at will and perhaps even from space at any point on the globe, does not provide sufficient means to destroy terrorist groups. These left Osama bin Laden and his men, the most likely perpetrators of yesterday's atrocities, untouched after the bombing of the East African embassies. Missile defence, of course, would be irrelevant to such attacks, which remain the most likely way, as so many critics have said, of conveying nuclear weapons on to American soil. America's best defence against terrorism originating from abroad remains the existence of governments and societies more or less satisfied with American even-handedness on issues which are important to them. Plainly, this is furthest from the case in the Muslim world. That is largely because of American policy on the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians, but also because there are some Arabs and other Muslims who also regard American and Western ascendancy as affronts in themselves. Contrary to stereotype, however, most Arab and Muslim, and especially Palestinian, radical groups set limits for both practical and moral reasons on the violence they consider permissible. They may not be limits which we, or Israelis, like, but they are limits all the same, and they are well short of planning anything like yesterday's attacks. Osama bin Laden's limits are another matter, which is why he is the prime suspect here. The head of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, in denying that his organisation had anything to do with the attacks, nevertheless went on to say yesterday that the discontent and anger which American policy was creating meant that its approach to the Middle East should be reviewed. His point is obvious. Anger is an asset which entrepreneurs of violence like Bin Laden can use. Would a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the establishment of an adequate Palestinian state end all Muslim terrorist violence? Perhaps not, but it would go a long way toward doing so. This not to argue that Washington's Middle Eastern policy should suddenly change because of these attacks. That would indeed be to argue in favour of blackmail. But that policy is part of a broader problem. As analysts like Paul Rogers of Bradford University have argued, there is a clear danger that the rich world as a whole, and not only the US, will pursue a policy of "keeping the lid on" much of the rest of the world's discontents. Fundamental problems of injustice and inequality get palliatives and an increasingly sophisticated military is supposedly in reserve, but actually not that competent, to deal with the resulting troubles. These are usually outbreaks of violence within or between poorer states, and they can also lead to breakdowns of state authority, or its assumption by groups completely unprepared to exercise power - and to havens for extremists. That, after all, is the story of Afghanistan. The US and Russia together helped turn Afghanistan into the backward and dangerous state that it has become. The US and Pakistan, with some British and other help, notoriously encouraged, because it was useful to them at the time, the rise of fundamentalist groups and the pan-Muslim recruitment of fighters. Out of this came the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. Americans understandably want pursuit and punishment. What nation would not in these circumstances? This was above all a stupendous crime. But it does not minimise that crime or take way from the need to identify and punish to say that this pursuit should be international, and that if the crime was planned in Muslim lands, the anticipation of Muslim governments is essential. Nor does it minimise the crime to say that western policy may have played a part in creating the anger which led to it. Finally it is proper to say that, while there is a global problem of inattention to injustice which is piling up trouble for the future, we are not yet facing an anarchic array of dangerous states and extreme movements. Terrorism is in fact more confined and has fewer havens than in the past. This outrage should not be a signal for the west to pull up the drawbridge but rather for a renewed international effort to deal with the fundamental problems that will blow up in all our faces if we let solutions drift away. martin.woollacott at guardian.co.uk Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 2)Dal comunicato stampa dei PeaceWorkers di San Francisco, speditoci con una lettera di David Hartsough che ha lavorato con noi nel Kossovo ......... Now is the time for us to clamber off the wheel of violence. It is the only worthy legacy we can offer to those who died today. To this end, I feel personally moved in more profound way that ever to recommit myself to the spiritual journey of creative nonviolence so that true justice can flourish and genuine peace can be every being's lot. This means mourning the dead, condemning this horrific violence, but also once and for all acknowledging our own violence and justice and seeking a new path. In this most shocking moment, we have paradoxically been given a moment to desire -- and work for -- the well-being of all. Let us let the unimaginably horrific violence experienced today in the Eastern United States help us understand, in a way we perhaps have never understood before, what such "death from the skies" means, and help us to humbly acknowledge the violence we have perpetrated in this way in the past and continue to contemplate, under certain politically-defined circumstances, in the future. Most of all, let us be transformed in light of this horror to recognize, again, that we are all one. In this moment of unspeakable fire, may we once and for all commit ourselves, in a deeply powerful way, to the path of active nonviolence for justice, love, and well being for the earth and for all its inhabitants. Let us take action so that, hope against hope, we can choose -- as Martin Luther King, Jr. implored -- nonviolence, not nonexistence. 3) Dear Brothers and Sisters, We at Peaceworkers are heartbroken by the tragedies that continue to unfold in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. The depth of the violence is incomprehensible. It is a time for us to draw our loved ones close. And, it a time for us to draw close to our hearts those not immediately in our circles and to keep those who have died close in our hearts and prayers. We also hold up the families and friends who either know their loved one has died or who wait in anguished limbo. We wish strength and endurance to those police, firefighters, rescue workers, medical personnel and public officials working to save lives. And, we ask each of us to draw close to those who will be scapegoated for these horrific acts. These acts were not carried out by an ethnic group, race of people or religion. Each of us individually and collectively, must be forthright in resisting any scapegoating or attempts to retaliate with violence. We also call upon the United States government not to respond with violence, thus escalating the spiral of violence. This is a time for deep reflection and grief. The horrible carnage reminds us that no amount of armaments can protect us from such violent attacks. It is a time to understand the unity of all people and to build our security based on that understanding. . Instead of hundreds of billions for weapons of destruction which we manufacture for ourselves and sell around the world, we should allocate hundreds of billions of dollars for feeding the world's hungry, housing the homeless, healing the sick and helping heal the wounds of war and hatred around the world. The only real security is for the United States to become a real friend of all the world's people. From: Ken Butigan, Adjunct Professor at the Franciscan School of Theology, Berkeley; 510-533-8181 kenbutigan at paceebene.org 4 Contro la violenza senza riprodurla Noi che cerchiamo di vivere la nonviolenza esprimiamo il dolore e la più grande pietà umana per le vittime delle stragi in USA e la solidarietà a tutti quanti nel mondo soffrono queste violenze e cercano pace e giustizia. Condannando questa enorme violenza diretta non dimentichiamo che nel mondo c'è una più profonda violenza strutturale che si esercita nell'oppressione politica, nello sfruttamento e nell'ingiustizia economica. Tutte queste violenze trovano origine e giustificazione in varie culture violente, arroganti e sprezzanti verso le altre. La critica del dominio non è mai un crimine, mentre il crimine non è mai una critica giusta ed efficace, ed è invece riproduzione e conferma dell'ingiustizia che apparentemente combatte. Ci dissociamo profondamente da coloro che hanno dimostrato esultanza perché i sentimenti di odio, che abbrutiscono l'uomo, devono essere vinti e superati in noi tutti combattendo, sì, l'ingiustizia ma con il rispetto assoluto per ogni vita . Condanniamo ugualmente ogni proposito di vendetta o pretesa di fare giustizia con le armi da parte del governo degli Stati Uniti e dei suoi alleati. L'indagine ed il giudizio sui responsabili di un tale crimine internazionale che offende tutta l'umanità compete all'ONU nelle sue legittime istituzioni. Movimento Nonviolento, Movimento internazionale per la riconciliazione Segreteria regionale del Piemonte e della Valle d'Aosta Torino, 12 settembre 2001
- Prev by Date: La rabbia americana puo' calmarsi?
- Next by Date: una polemica sul messaggio di Dino Frisullo
- Previous by thread: La rabbia americana puo' calmarsi?
- Next by thread: una polemica sul messaggio di Dino Frisullo
- Indice: