"Today we gave another lesson in
dignity to the imperialists, it is another defeat for the empire of Mr.
Danger....another defeat for the devil. We will never be a colony of the
US again....Long live the socialist revolution....Destiny has been
written....Socialism is human. Socialism is love."
This is
how Hugo Chavez Frias characterized his smashing electoral victory on
December 3 when he appeared on the balcony of the Palacio de Miraflores
(the official presidential palace residence) and addressed a huge
gathering of his followers below that evening telling them of his victory
for the people and that he now has an even stronger mandate to pursue his
Bolivarian Project to do more for them ahead than he's already
accomplished so far which is considerable.
He told his loyal, cheering supporters
his impressive landslide electoral victory is one more blow to George
Bush, and it follows on the others won by populist candidates in the
region in the past six weeks by Ignacio Lula da Silva in Brazil on October
29, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua on November 7, and Rafael Correa in Equador
on November 26. Chavez will serve for another six year term that will run
until December, 2012.
Earlier in the day, Hugo Chavez showed
he's indeed a man of the people by casting his own vote the same way
ordinary people do. Unlike George Bush who goes everywhere in an entourage
of limousine, helicopter, or Air Force One luxury accompanied by a phalanx
of security needed to protect him from the people he was elected to serve,
Chavez drove himself in his aging red-colored Volkswagon to his assigned
polling station accompanied by his young grandson in the back seat, voted,
and then left the same unaccompanied way he came. That's how a man of the
people does it - no bells, whistles or extravagant trappings of power
that's a hallmark of how things are done to excess in the US calling
itself a model democracy but one only for the few with wealth and power
and that behaves like a rogue state that's only a model for despots and
tyrants.
In Venezuela under Hugo Chavez there's
real participatory democracy for all the people. After it played out in a
fair and open electoral process, Chavez greeted his supporters in an
atmosphere of jubilant celebration once National Electoral Council (CNE)
president Lucena Tibisay announced at 10:30 PM election night that with
about 78% of the vote tallied, Chavez received 61.4% (5,936,000 votes) to
right wing opposition candidate Manuel Rosales 38% (3,715,000 votes).
The early figures were then updated
showing Chavez increased his advantage to 62.89% (7,161,637 votes),
handily defeating Rosales by about 26 points (at about 37%) - an
impressive nearly two to one thrashing. It was also announced that voter
turnout was about 75% or the highest percentage in Venezuela's history
making this election an historic event and a clear mandate for Hugo
Chavez.
Once the first results were announced
on election night, it was clear to Mr. Rosales he'd lost and he was forced
to concede defeat. He added, however, he would continue opposing the
policies of the Chavez government "struggling for the people of Venezuela
(and announcing) we are beginning the struggle for the construction of a
new time for Venezuela....and I won't stop there, from today on I will be
in the streets (staying) in the struggle, in the fight." He didn't say
what he has in mind is returning the country to its ugly past serving the
interests of wealth and power and ignoring the needs of ordinary people,
all his pious rhetoric aside. He's sure to get lots of encouragement and
help from Washington as its unbending agenda going forward is to do
precisely that. Short of an armed invasion, however, it may be harder than
ever to do that as Hugo Chavez came out ahead in all 23 of Venezuela's
states including in Rosales' home state of Zulia that went for Chavez with
a 50.57% majority, an embarrassment he also neglected to mention in his
concession statement cum bravado. A dozen other candidates participated in
the election as well, but had nothing to brag about, getting in total less
than half of one percent of the vote total.
From the US capitol, State Department
spokeswoman Janelle Hironimus added her government's response without a
touch of irony from an administration that's already tried and failed
three times to oust Hugo Chavez: The US government recognizes the right of
the Venezuelan people "to elect the government of their choice and the
path they want for their country." US Undersecretary of State for Latin
America Thomas Shannon added: "We do not want a relationship of
confrontation (with Venezuela). We've always looked for ways to deepen the
dialogue with....President Chavez (and we hope) he will show a greater
interest."
Neither US official tried explaining
that their post-election good faith rhetoric is belied by their
government's actions since the Bush administration came to power in 2001
trying every underhanded trick it could cook up to undermine and oust Hugo
Chavez and is still engaging in subversion. It would be quite a change in
the Bush White House if it ever practiced what it always disingenuously
preaches fooling no one, especially Hugo Chavez and his government.
The same kind of post-election forked
tongue comments came from US Ambassador William Brownfield who
congratulated Venezuelans on a smooth and peaceful election and indicated
Washington's willingness to have a less confrontational relationship with
Chavez saying: "We recognize that and we're ready, willing and eager to
explore and see if we can make progress on bilateral issues." Hugo Chavez
understands full well the kind of relationship the ambassador means and
responded to the overture: "They want dialogue but on the condition that
you accept their positions. If the government of the United States wants
dialogue, Venezuela will always have its door open. But I doubt the US
government is sincere....we are a free country. We were once a North
American colony, and we will not be one ever again."
Chavez was being polite but firm as he
knows the US is never sincere in its dealings with other countries and is
determined to remove him from office. Also, its relations with all Global
South countries are uncompromisingly ones on an "our way or the highway"
basis. For Hugo Chavez, that's no way, and it's hard to imagine relations
between the two countries will change going forward, at least under a Bush
administration. Chavez explained further saying: "How are we going to have
good relations with a government that has financed conspiratorial
activities here?"
It's also a government establishing
closer ties with the military in Latin American countries (circumventing
ruling governments if necessary) to counter the influence and spread of
populist leftist governments like Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Former US
Southern Command General Bantz Craddock explained the real sentiment of
the Bush administration toward the region when he said: "The challenges
facing Latin America and the Caribbean today are significant to our
national security. We ignore them at our peril." He wasn't referring to
the need to be more conciliatory to populist leftist leaders like those in
Venezuela, Bolivia or Ecuador (in January) or Fidel Castro in Cuba (the US
has tried and failed many dozens or even hundreds of times to kill) who
have notions of governance much different than those in
Washington.
For the moment at least, the cheering
crowd outside the Miraflores on election night had other thoughts on their
mind, but like their president demand nothing less than a relationship
based on equality and respect with their dominant northern neighbor. They
gathered in the late evening pouring rain dressed in their signature red
T-shirts and caps, waving Venezuela flags and shouting "Uh, ah, Chavez no
se va" - "Uh, ah, Chavez will not go." It continued all night in the
celebratory streets of Caracas echoing Chavez's words repeating "Libertad
(liberty) and telling the crowd this was a victory for them, for socialism
and for the Bolivarian Revolution he now wants to advance to the next
stage.
Venezuela Under Chavez - How
Real Democratic Elections Are Run
The polls opened at 7AM on Sunday,
December 3, but hours earlier people were already queueing up in their
eagerness to participate in Venezuela's democratic electoral process. Most
of them, as we know, were there to support Hugo Chavez Frias as their
president and won't allow anyone else to have the job as long as he wants
it. The lines were long at many of the stations, but observers noted
voting across the country ran smoothly with only minor problems that were
no obstacle to the electoral process. About 1400 observers were on hand to
witness the day's events including 10 representatives from the Carter
Center in the US, 130 from the European Union (EU), 60 from the
Organization of American States (OAS) and 10 from the Mercosur Common
Market of the South countries.
At day's end, OAS team leader Juan
Enrique Fisher congratulated Venezuelan officials for a "transparent and
well-run election....We congratulate the Venezuelan people for their
spirit of citizenship, President Chavez for his popular mandate and
candidate Rosales for his civic spirit and for fortifying democracy." He
described the voting as "massive and peaceful" and added scattered reports
of voting equipment malfunctions were minor and more attributable to voter
unfamiliarity with the machines than to irregularities. Spanish
parliamentarian Willy Meyer, one of seven members from the European
Parliament, noted the process was smooth-running and turnout was "massive,
well-arranged and happy..." European Union leader Antonio Garcia Velasquez
said Venezuelan electoral officials gave them "complete liberty and with
all requirements so that the job (of observing) can be fulfilled in
conformity with our stipulations." The NGO Electoral Eye noted in an
afternoon statement that 99% of the voting centers were operating
"completely normally."
Voting took place using 33,000 ballot
tables at 11,118 polling stations throughout the country, and each
candidate in the election was allowed to have observers present at all of
them if they wished. All registered Venezuelans, of course, could vote
including the 57,667 eligible ones located in other countries. Voting took
place on Sunday to make it as easy as possible for people to participate,
and while polling stations were scheduled to close at 4PM Caracas time,
most stayed open as long as there were people in line who hadn't yet
voted.
Venezuela's Electoral Process
Prior to the Election of Hugo Chavez
Before Hugo Chavez was first elected
the country's president in December, 1998, less than half of all eligible
Venezuelans were registered to vote and thus were unable to participate in
choosing their elected officials who might help them raise their standard
of living including the great majority of impoverished people in the
country most in need of positive change. For decades previously, two
parties in the country, Democratic Action (AD) and Social Christian Party
(COPEI), dominated the political process through a power-sharing
arrangement that served the interests of Venezuela's wealthy elite and its
"sifrino" middle class ignoring the needs and rights of the great majority
of poor and effectively disenfranchised. It finally boiled over in the
streets in the late 1980s and 1990s that led to the governing coalition
bringing Hugo Chavez to power in 1998 that changed everything - just the
way Chavez promised he's do it if elected.
Along with his political and social
revolution, Chavez promised to address the problem of electoral fraud and
exclusion that had to be overcome for any true democracy to exist. At the
outset of his first term in office, the National Assembly strengthened
earlier reforms and initiated new ones focusing on voter access and
rights, security and eliminating the kinds of fraudulent practices that
characterized Venezuelan elections in the past.
A major and successful initiative was
later established in 2003 known as Mision Itentidad (Mission Identity)
that aimed to implement Article 56 of the Bolivarian Constitution stating:
"All persons have the right to be registered free of charge with the Civil
Registry Office after birth, and to obtain public documents constituting
evidence of the biological identity, in accordance with law." The Mission
constituted a combined mass citizenship and voter registration drive
that's given millions of ordinary Venezuelans national ID cards granting
them the full rights of citizenship they never before had. It also
resulted in over five million Venezuelans being able to register and vote
in elections for the first time ever up to the middle of 2006 - including
qualified immigrants and indigenous people who never before had any
rights. In 2000, before this initiative was begun, 11 million Venezuelans
were registered to vote. By September, 2006, the number had grown to over
16 million in a country of 27 million people.
How the Electoral Process Is
Administered
The electoral process is administered
by the National Electoral Council (CNE). It's an independent body,
separate from the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of
government or any private corporate interests. It's comprised of 11
members of the National Assembly and 10 representatives of civil society,
none of whom are appointed by the President.
Elections are now conducted in
Venezuela using Smartmatic touchscreen electronic voting machines with
verifiable paper ballot receipts that voters can check to assure they
confirm the vote they cast and then are saved by the CNE to have as a
permanent record of vote totals that can be used in case a recount is
needed. They also require voters to leave an electronic thumbprint to
assure no one votes more than once.
The machines work as intended leading
the Carter Center to comment, based on their observations of their use:
"The automated machines worked well and the voting results do reflect the
will of the people." Further independent studies verified the same thing
including ones carried out by vote-process experts at the University of
California Berkeley, Johns Hopkins, Stanford and elsewhere. Great care was
taken in their design to eliminate any possibility of tampering. It
involves using a special technology splitting the security codes into four
parts that has been endorsed in numerous voting security reports because
it makes the machines used in Venezuela the most advanced system in the
world according to the European Union Election Observation Mission in the
country.
How Elections Are Now Run in
the US
Contrast this exercise of real
participatory democracy with the way things are done in the US, especially
since the fraud-laden election bringing the Bush administration to power.
A growing number of investigations have since revealed how corrupted the
electoral process has become, especially in national elections, where a
systematic effort has been made to disenfranchise portions of those
segments of eligible voters likely to oppose Republican candidates or
selected Democrats representing elitist interests. Many techniques are
used to do it starting with the privatization of the electoral process
that gives large electronic voting machine companies total unregulated
control over it.
In the 2004 national election, more
than 80% of the US vote was cast and counted on these machines owned,
programmed and operated by three large corporations, most of which have no
verifiable paper ballot receipts making it impossible to have a recount as
any done, if needed, will only verify the first result being challenged.
The process now is secretive and unreliable run by private corporate
interests with everything to gain if candidates they support win, and
based on what's now known, that's exactly what's happened. As long as this
system prevails, the US electoral process is fraudulent on its face making
a sham of the notion of the kind of free, fair and open elections that are
a hallmark of the way things are run under Hugo Chavez.
It's what one observer, commenting on
US elections, calls the "ultimate crime" as the very bedrock of democracy
depends on the right of the electorate to exercise its will at the polls
without it being subverted by private or other interests. Its importance
is what Tom Paine said about it at the nation's founding: "The right of
voting for representatives is the primary right by which all other rights
are protected. To take away this right (as has happened in the US) is to
reduce a man to slavery."
Subversion with electronic voting
machine manipulation is only part of the problem as investigations have
also uncovered much more revealing a systematic perversion of the
democratic process. In the 2000 and 2004 national elections in the US,
millions of votes cast were never counted that included "spoiled ballots,"
rejected absentee ballots and others lost or deliberately ignored in the
count. In addition, there's been massive voter roll purging, for a variety
of reasons, that added up to one common denominator - eligible voters
disenfranchised were likely to vote for the "wrong" candidates so they
were denied the right to vote at all. In Venezuela under Hugo Chavez
today, every eligible voter can register and is encouraged to vote without
fear their vote cast will disappear, go to another candidate or they will
be purged from the voter roles. That's how a true democracy is supposed to
work, and in Venezuela today it does. In the US it doesn't, and it shows
in the results. It also shows in that half or more of eligible voters here
never bother showing up on election day believing, with justification,
their votes don't count.
Another major difference between the
two countries is in Venezuela the people are informed well enough to
understand what the candidates stand for, how their government serves
them, and they're willing to actively engage to keep their hard-won
democratic rights and social benefits they won't give up without a fight.
In contrast, in the US, the public is lulled into believing in an illusion
of democracy and the rights of the people guaranteed under one that don't
exist anymore, if they ever did. Because of their apathy, they're not in
the streets like the people of Venezuela, their comrades in Mexico, who
aren't as fortunate, or the anti-Bush/Olmert masses comprising up to half
the population of Lebanon in the streets of Beirut demanding real
democracy, justice and an end to Western domination. Instead, they're home
or out shopping because they fail to understand unless they go there in
large enough numbers for the rights they don't, in fact, have, they'll
never get them.
Chavez's Goal to Build A
Socialist Society in the 21st Century
Chavez first announced to the world
his hope to build a socialist society in the 21st century in Venezuela at
the January 30, 2005 Fifth World Social Forum. He wants a humanistic one
based on solidarity, not the bureaucratic kind that doomed the Soviet
Union and Eastern European states where governments were top - down with
no participation of the people who ended up ill-served. Later on, Chavez
elaborated saying "We have assumed the commitment to direct the Bolivarian
Revolution towards socialism....a new socialism....a socialism of the 21st
century....based in solidarity, fraternity, love, justice, liberty and
equality" beyond the free-market model based on exploitation of working
people for the interests of capital.
The Chavez government has pursued
these goals incrementally since it came to power in February, 1999
following Hugo Chavez's election in December, 1998. He promised
Venezuelans his vision of a Bolivarian Revolution to free them from what
19th century liberator Simon Bolivar called the imperial curse that always
"plague(d) Latin America with misery in the name of liberty." His Movement
for the Fifth Republic Party (MVR) got a peoples' mandate for change at
its outset to draft a new constitution that transformed Venezuela from an
oligarchy serving wealth and power alone to a model humanist democratic
state serving everyone based on solidarity and the principles of
political, economic and social justice.
He delivered in ways unimaginable in
the US where essential government-delivered services for the people are
denounced as radical and denied in a nation now dominated by a reactionary
ideology and the notion that only neoliberal market-based solutions are
acceptable - even though it's proved they don't work. Under this flawed
model, government only works for the privileged few that benefit under its
law-of-the-jungle rules that come at the expense of the great majority
losing out the way it always happens in a top-down society run by and for
them. This is the state of things today in the US, a nation where its
founding principles have been turned upside down and is now run by and for
plutocrats with values corrupted by false notions of fairness, equity and
justice.
That was how Venezuela was governed
before the age of Hugo Chavez. In the 28 years before he was first
elected, the people suffered from deprivation, neglect and indifference.
Venezuelan inflation-adjusted per capita income fell 35% in those years,
the worst decline in the region and one of the worst in the world. Chavez
halted the decline and turned it around as high oil prices and a favorable
economic climate lifted the nation's growth to the highest level in the
region following the crippling 2002-03 oil strike and destabilizing
effects of the short-lived coup deposing Hugo Chavez for two days in
April, 2002. Since that time, unemployment declined and the crushing
poverty level in the country fell from a high of around 62% in 2003 to a
level near 40% today and falling.
Chavez, however, went much further by
enshrining the principles of a participatory democracy and its social
revolution in the new 1999 Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela. It mandates revolutionary structural changes for political,
economic and social justice that include quality health care for all as a
"fundamental social right and....responsibility....of the state." It bans
discrimination, guarantees free _expression_ Chavez's fiercest critics enjoy
and use to the fullest against him without recrimination, provides for
housing assistance, an improved social security pension system for
seniors, assures support for the rights of indigenous people, and requires
quality education be made available for all to the highest level that
virtually eliminated illiteracy - compared to the stated 20% level here in
the US according to the Department of Education figures but which, in
fact, is much higher and increasing based on the best evidence of
functional illiteracy among the secondary student populations of the
nation's inner cities.
That would now be unacceptable in
Venezuela where Chavez post-election wants to take his Revolution to the
next level doing more than ever for his people. Along with all of the
above, the government additionally already provides subsidized food for
those in need, land reform, job training and micro-credit. It's a country
in which most of the productive capacity is state or privately owned, but
a great emphasis has been made to be innovative and go in new directions,
experimenting with the idea of co-management with state-owned enterprises
allowed to be jointly managed by the workers in them. A major effort has
also been made to expand the number of cooperatives outside of state or
private control, and since Chavez was first elected the total number of
them has grown from 800 to 100,000 employing 1.5 million people or 10% of
the adult population and rising.
Another of Chavez's top priorities
since first taking office in 1999 has been land reform. The country has
long been run by rich oligarchs including large land-owning ones that
allowed 5% of the largest landowners to control 75% of the land and 75% of
the smallest ones to have only 6% of it. Chavez is trying to implement
land reform legislation allowing underused land owned by the latifundistas
(the large rich landowners) to be redistributed to landless campesinos
who'll put it to productive use and improve their lives in the
process.
Chavez also wants to continue
enhancing all the above-listed programs that have improved the lives of
his people including the many innovative social Missions using the
country's oil wealth to do it. His impressive electoral victory gives him
a greater mandate than ever to advance his Bolivarian Project to the next
level and his vision of socialism or social democracy in the 21st century.
It won't be a simple task as the power of the oligarchs supported by the
Bush administration, and what may succeed it, are powerful obstacles in
the way of social advance. So far he's achieved wonders for the past eight
years in the face of great odds, but much more needs to be done. With the
power of the Venezuelan people standing with him, not willing to give up
the great gains already gotten, Chavez is now looking ahead to advance the
country's social democracy well into the new century.
Hugo Chavez is now an empowered symbol
and leader of a growing social revolutionary populist movement slowly
spreading in the region that needs to be turned into an unstoppable
juggernaut. It represents a hopeful and promising alternative to
generations of entrenched elitism backed by military power along with
oppressive US dominance and the poisonous effects of the neoliberal
Washington Consensus model savagely exploiting the Global South for the
interests of capital in the North. It's a way to be free from the
US-controlled IMF and World Bank debt-bondage demanding in return
punishing fiscal austerity, state-owned industry privatizations, social
neglect, the loss of organized labor rights in a system of market
deregulation benefitting the privileged alone at the expense of staggering
levels of poverty, deprivation and inequality for the majority. It's a way
to build a free society of, for and by the people unbeholden to wealth and
power. It's a way to reduce poverty and inequality and improve the lives
of ordinary people in ways never thought possible in the developing world
until Hugo Chavez had a vision and was able to implement it and begin its
spread.
Chavez now has allies in Bolivia,
Ecuador, Brazil, Argentina, Cuba, Nicaragua, Uruguay and even Chile that
still exists under the shadow of Augusto Pinochet and his 17 year
dictatorship that crushed the strongest democracy in the region and from
whose rule the country has yet to fully recover, but hopefully has a
chance under its new more enlightened leader. They represent what author
Tariq Ali refers to in the region as an "Axis of Hope," and Chavez has now
earned enough political capital to bring it closer to fruition.
The momentum in Latin America is with
Hugo Chavez and his allies if they can seize it and take it to the next
level. The chance for success has never been better with the US more
vulnerable than ever and staggering from its loss of dominance in the
Middle East and the forces arrayed against it there showing they can stand
up to the most powerful nation on earth and prevail. It's a sign America
is not all-powerful, is in decline politically and economically and
choosing an independent course is an alternative that can work if enough
nations unite and do it together.
The region's most dominant nations
have already shown they can oppose Washington and prevail. Following
Argentina's IMF-imposed structurally adjusted economic meltdown at the end
of the 1990s, President Nestor Kirchner got the financial markets in 2005
to accept his take-it-or-leave-it offer of 30 cents on the dollar payment
on the country's unrepayable sovereign debt of around $130 billion and
have to accept it in the form of long-term, low-interest bonds.
Then, events at the November, 2005
Summit of the Americas in Mar del Playa, Argentina sounded the death knell
for the US-proposed Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) expansion
of the disastrous NAFTA model because the dominant Southern Common Market
Mercosur countries in the region of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay
and Venezuela want no part of it signaling for scholar Immanuel
Wallerstein that "The Monroe Doctrine is dead. And there are few
mourners."
And yet another blow to US-promoted
globalization came with the collapse of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
Doha (so-called "Development") Round talks in July, 2006 because more
developing countries now realize the US/Western-one-way trade deals have
been disastrous despite disingenuous rosy promises of economic growth and
prosperity that only delivered increased poverty, deprivation and
environmental destruction instead.
Before these agreements from hell were
ever agreed to, average per capital income growth in Latin America was 82%
from 1960 to 1980 (4% per person, per year). Once the notion of
globalization took hold after 1980 based on the Washington Consensus
neoliberal model, the rate of income growth in the region through 2000
fell to 9% (less than half of 1% per person, per year), and since 2000 it
dropped to 5% - a stunning indictment of how so-called "free-trade"
US-style (that isn't "fair trade") is a formula for economic ruin for
those countries adopting it, and significant ones like Brazil, Argentina,
Venezuela, Bolivia and others in Latin America want no more of
it.
It remains to be seen going forward if
this kind of momentum can continue, gain strength with new allies working
together for the common self-interest of all to break free from the
dominant US chokehold by asserting their independence as Venezuela under
Hugo Chavez has shown can be done and be able to get away with it and
benefit as a result.
Further success in Venezuela and
elsewhere depends on breaking free from what South African born and now
activist and distinguished Bolivarian Venezuelan Professor of philosophy
and political science Franz Lee says must be accomplished ahead:
"(Getting) rid of all the five tentacles of capitalist imperialism:
exploitation, domination, discrimination, militarization and
alienation....in a class struggle against global fascism." In Venezuela,
the process has only just begun. Hugo Chavez has taken up the challenge to
move it ahead, but he'll need the support of other enlightened leaders to
boldly go with him where he's already gone and then take it a lot further
to achieve a peoples' victory over the forces that have long held them
down and denied them the equity and justice they deserve.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago
and can be reached at lendmanstephen at sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog
site at www.sjlendman.blogspot.com.