[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

foreste e protocollo di Kyoto



Cari tutti,

come forse sapete una delle questioni controverse nei negoziati sulle 
riduzioni delle emissioni di gas serra e' se concedere o no 'carbon 
credits' in cambio della messa a dimora di alberi, che sequestrerebbero 
anidride carbonica dall'atmosfera.
Le opinioni sono discordi. La Union of Concerned Scientist, per esempio, 
e' cautamente favorevole perche' ritiene che questo conferisca uno 
strumento in piu'(uando usato in modo appropriato) , e quindi 
elasticita'...associazioni ambientaliste come WWF e Greenpeace sono 
contrarie perche' sostengono che cio' portera' a frodi e alla 
distruzione di foreste (semi)naturali.
Il comunicato qui sotto esemplifica quella che secondo queste 
associazioni potrebbe divenire la regola .
Sara' necessario esaminare pro e contro con cautela su questa questione.

Spero interessi.

Alessandro Gimona
agimona@libero.it

--------------------------------------------
Robert Kihara,
  Press Officer,
  WWF International, Gland-Switzerland.
  ********************************************
  Press Release   Embargoed for 23.00 GMT on Wednesday 8 November 2000

  ### Kyoto Protocol could accelerate forest destruction, warn WWF and
  Greenpeace

  New report shows that use of carbon storage in trees may lead to 
clearance
  of old-growth native forest

  London, UK - Relying on forest plantations to store carbon pollution 
from
  the atmosphere and combat climate change could accelerate the 
destruction
  of old-growth native forest around the world, according to a report
  commissioned by Greenpeace and WWF, the conservation organization. The
  report, released today, challenges the assumption that carbon storage 
in
  trees will yield environmental benefits. It concludes instead, "the
  economics of the developing carbon sequestration market is becoming an
  additional driver for clearing native forests."

  Whether industrialised nations will be allowed to gamble on forests as
  temporary carbon stores rather than reduce emissions of global warming
  gases at source is one of the most controversial topics in two weeks 
of
  intergovernmental negotiations on the Kyoto Protocol that open in The
  Hague, Holland, on Monday 13 November. Under the Protocol, 
industrialized
  nations have to reduce their emissions 5 per cent below their 1990 
levels
  by 2008-2012. The United States, Japan, Australia and Canada want to 
avoid
  domestic efforts to control their rapidly growing carbon emissions 
from
  energy use by counting forest carbon storage and so claim to be 
meeting
  their Kyoto targets. Furthermore, the Protocol contains a perverse
  incentive in allowing countries to claim a carbon credit for planting 
trees
  but not incur a carbon debit for deforestation.

  Today's report, entitled "The Clearcut Case: How the Kyoto Protocol 
Could
  Become a Driver for Deforestation", examines a number of Australian
  projects as case studies of what could emerge as a dangerous new
  international threat to forests and the species they support. (1)

  The report outlines how Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), Japan's
  largest power utility, is implicated in the destruction of native 
forest in
  the Tamar Valley in the Australian state of Tasmania, and its 
replacement
  by fast-growing eucalyptus plantations intended for carbon credits 
under
  the Kyoto Protocol. TEPCO's investment of Aus$10 million (ca. US$5 
million)
  in Tamar Tree Farms accounts for 3,000 hectares of eucalyptus 
plantation
  which are expected to yield TEPCO 130,000 tonnes of carbon credits 
that
  could be offset against rising carbon emissions in Japan. The report 
shows
  how this project is not an isolated incident but is compatible with 
the
  forest-clearance programmes of the Australian and Tasmanian 
authorities.

  "Claiming credit for carbon stored in trees is a blatant attempt by 
some
  countries to cheat on their Kyoto commitments," said Bill Hare,
  Greenpeace's Climate Policy Director. "This report shows that it is 
also
  bad for the environment, leading in some cases to the destruction of
  old-growth forest to make way for 'carbon-sink' plantations."

  "The only way to combat climate change is through deep cuts in 
emissions of
  global warming gases," said Jennifer Morgan, Director of WWF's Climate
  Change Campaign. "The Tasmania project is an example of what could go
  terribly wrong for forests around the world if Japan, Australia, 
Canada and
  the United States get their way. We could see native forest 
destruction
  accelerate but still see no benefit for the global climate. This is
  potentially the largest of a number of loopholes in the Kyoto climate
  treaty that governments urgently need to close."

  The threat to forest conservation will be exacerbated if decisions on
  Kyoto's "Clean Development Mechanism" promote 'carbon sinks' projects 
by
  industrialised nations in developing countries, where gathering of 
accurate
  data on forests would be considerably more difficult than in Tasmania.

  Greenpeace and WWF are calling on the 184 Parties to the Climate 
Convention
  to exclude reliance on carbon sinks from the Kyoto Protocol, and from 
its
  Clean Development Mechanism. The organizations want industrialized 
nations
  to achieve their Kyoto commitments through domestic reductions in 
global
  warming gases.

  "The global forest commons is facing its biggest challenge since the
  Industrial Revolution," said report author Tim Cadman of the Native 
Forest
  Network. "Many forest-dependent species are on the brink of 
destruction.
  How ironic it would be if the Kyoto Protocol were complicit in sending 
some
  of them over the edge."

  Proposals for relying on plantations to soak up carbon overlook the
  vulnerability of forests to global warming, and the urgency of cutting
  emissions. According to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
Change
  whose Second Assessment Report from 1995 is the current international
  scientific consensus on climate change, one third of the world's 
forests
  will undergo major changes as a result of global warming. Entire 
forest
  types may disappear and large amounts of carbon could be released into 
the
  atmosphere during transitions from one forest type to another.(2)

  For further information:

  **Robert Kihara, Press Officer, WWF International, Gland, Switzerland. 
Tel:
  +41 22 364 9550;
  E-mail: rkihara@wwfint.org
  **Andrew Kerr, Public Affairs Manager, WWF Climate Change Campaign. 
Tel:
  +31 6 5161 9462 (mobile); E-mail: rrek@compuserve.com
  **Jon Walter, Press Officer, Greenpeace International, Tel: +31 20 524
  9608; E-mail: jwalter@ams.greenpeace.org
  **Bill Hare, Climate Policy Director, Greenpeace International. Tel: 
+31 6
  2129 6899 (mobile); E-mail: bhare@ams.greenpeace.org
  **Tim Cadman, Tel: +61 2 6655 9841; E-mail: tcadman@nfn.org.au