[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
Sign-On Letter to Heads of State - NPT Review Conference -Abolishing N-Weapons
- Subject: Sign-On Letter to Heads of State - NPT Review Conference -Abolishing N-Weapons
- From: John Hallam <nonukes at foesyd.org.au>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:44:31 +0100
John Hallam Friends of the Earth Sydney, 17 Lord Street, Newtown, NSW, Australia, 2042 Fax (61)(2)9517-3902 ph (61)(2)9517-3903 nonukes at foesyd.org.au http://homepages.tig.com.au/~foesyd RE: ENSURING A SUCCESSFUL NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY REVIEW CONFERENCE. ABOLISHING NUCLEAR WEAPONS Dear Everyone, Can you put your signature to this? It is a sign- on letter for organisations and parliamentarians, to heads of both nuclear and non- nuclear weapon states, concerning the nuclear nonproliferation treaty review conference which is coming up April 24-May 19th in New York. According to Article VI of the NPT, signed as long ago as 1968, and according to the 1996 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice, "there exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control" . The letter asks the nuclear weapons states to do just that, and warns that if this is not done the credibility of the NPT is at stake. If you or your organisation thinks that the nuclear weapons states should fulfil their clear legal obligation to negotiate nuclear weapons out of existence, please sign this letter. To sign, email me at nonukes at foesyd.org.au John Hallam, Nuclear Campaigner, Friends of the Earth Sydney Australia TO: PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, (US) +1-202-456-2461, 1-202-456-2883, 1-202-456-6218, 1-202-456-6201 PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN, (RUSSIA) +7-095-205-4330, +7-095-206-5173, FOREIGN MINISTER IGOR IVANOV(RUSSIA) +7-095-247-2722, +7-095-293-3323 PRIME MINISTER TONY BLAIR, (UK) +44-171-925-0918 PRESIDENT JACQUES CHIRAC (FRANCE)+33-147-42-2465, PRIME MINISTER LIONEL JOSPIN (FRANCE) +33-142-34-2677 PRESIDENT JIANG XEMIN (CHINA) CC PRIME MINISTER A.B. VAJPAYEE, (INDIA)+91-11-301-6857 PRESIDENT MOHAMMED RAFIQ DARAR(PAKISTAN) 9251-920-3938, FOREIGN MINISTER ABDUL SATTAR (PAKISTAN) 9251-920-7217 PRIME MINISTER EHUD BARAK (ISRAEL) +972-266-4838, ALL HEADS OF STATE AND FOREIGN MINISTERS OF STATES PARTY TO THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT) UNITED NATIONS AMBASSADORS OF STATES PARTY TO THE NPT RE: ENSURING A SUCCESSFUL NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY REVIEW CONFERENCE. Dear Heads of State, Foreign Ministers, and Ambassadors, The undersigned organizations, representing many millions of deeply concerned people worldwide, are writing to you regarding the Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) at the United Nations in New York, April 24-May 19, 2000. This meeting has crucial implications not only for NPT member states, but also for non-member states, especially India, Pakistan and Israel. We believe the 2000 Review Conference could and should be a catalyst in breaking the deadlock in the nuclear disarmament arena. It represents an opportunity to make real progress toward nuclear disarmament, and nuclear weapons abolition, which is essential to the achievement of common security based on human and ecological values and respect for international institutions and law. Failure in this regard could lead to the unraveling of the NPT regime. This is exactly opposite to the wishes and expectations of the majority of the people of the world. It is clear from recent polls, that the overwhelming majority of the world's people expect no less than immediate commencement of multilateral negotiations leading to the elimination of nuclear weapons through a global treaty in fulfillment of Article VI. Crucial to the outcome of this Review Conference will be the extent to which the nuclear weapon states are willing to act on their unambiguous legal obligation and commitment to the elimination of their nuclear weapons as called for by Article VI, which states: "Each of the parties to the treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control." Since the 1995 Review and Extension Conference, the importance of Article VI and the NPT itself has been reinforced by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which concluded unanimously in its 1996 Advisory Opinion that: "there exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control" While some progress has been achieved over the last decade in the reduction of the total number of nuclear weapons deployed by the nuclear weapon states, these states maintain their commitment to highly dangerous nuclear military doctrines as a cornerstone of their defence and security policy, some for the indefinite future. Progress on fulfilling Article VI obligations is thus stalled, and the development of new nuclear dangers is encouraged. The following developments represent a growing peril that challenges international and human security, and to which NPT states parties and especially nuclear states must respond creatively: --Ten years after the end of the Cold War, over 30,000 nuclear weapons remain worldwide, and India and Pakistan have both tested nuclear weapons. --Though UN and European Parliament resolutions have drawn attention to the Article VI obligations and to the ICJ Advisory Opinion, NATO has jeopardized the NPT by its re-affirmation in April 1999 that nuclear weapons are 'essential' to its security. While the NATO nuclear policy review is welcome, it is preempted and undercut by this reaffirmation. -- The US and Russia failed to respond to worldwide pressure to de- alert by December 1999, and each maintain over 2000 nuclear warheads on permanent 'launch on warning' status. This continues in spite of the incorporation of de-alerting into the 1996 recommendations of the Canberra Commission, into two resolutions passed by massive majorities in the UN General Assembly in 1998, and again in 1999, and a unanimous resolution of the European Parliament of November 18, 1999. --Key states have failed to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), opened for signature in 1996. The US Senate in October 1999 voted down ratification, in spite of the nearly unanimous endorsement of that treaty by the international community and overwhelming US public support for nuclear disarmament and the CTBT. --The clear aim of the CTBT is to constrain weapons development: yet the US, Russia, and other nuclear states still proceed with the development of new nuclear weapon types and modifications in computer-simulated 'virtual reality', with the aid of sub-critical underground nuclear testing, which undermines both the spirit and purpose of the treaty. In particular, US activities at the National Ignition Facility and the French Megajoule laser project enable further weapons development. --In 2000, the US may decide to deploy a National Ballistic Missile Defence (NMD) system which would violate the existing Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972, which is fundamental to the existing strategic arms restraints between the United States and Russia. NMD deployment could set back progress on Article VI objectives for years to come. --Presidential Decision Directive 60 has reaffirmed US use of nuclear weapons as a 'cornerstone' of its security policy. Meanwhile, Russia has steadily moved toward a more ready use of nuclear weapons in recent years. The potential dangers in this are extreme. In light of the above developments, lack of progress on Article VI obligations poses the increasing danger that some non-nuclear states will conclude that it is in their interests to acquire nuclear weapons, while those that have already tested them will proceed to further weaponisation and expansion of their arsenals. A positive and creative response to the above, and commitment and leadership on behalf of both human life and all other life is urgently demanded. Of critical importance in addressing the currently unacceptable situation are interim measures such as de-alerting, and the removal of weapons from delivery systems, aimed at decreasing the possibility of accidental nuclear war and at increasing mutual trust and establishing a momentum toward nuclear weapons elimination. NPT states parties should resolve, as a first step, that all nuclear forces be immediately stood down from high alert status. We urge all nuclear weapons states leaders, and all NPT Review participants, as a matter of the highest priority and urgency, as well as a clear legal obligation, to take action to complete unfinished disarmament objectives and to begin urgent negotiations toward a treaty to eliminate nuclear weapons. Immediate steps (both in the CD and other fora) must be taken by the nuclear states that will lead clearly and swiftly toward negotiations in fulfillment of Article VI. You, as a world leader, have the fate of the world in your hands during these discussions. We therefore strongly urge you to attend this review conference, as you have the authority to commence negotiations to eliminate nuclear weapons. By doing so, you can to alter the course of history and leave a legacy of a more secure future for this generation and for those to come. Failure to do so risks a revived nuclear arms race that ultimately could destroy civilization. (Signed) (International Organizations) Kate Dewes, Vice-President, International Peace Bureau, Christchurch, NZ., Bruna Nota,/Felicity Hill, Womens International League for Peace and Freedom, (WILPF), Geneva/NY, Ian Maddocks (Chair), Dr. Mary Wynne-Asford, Co-President, Merav Datan, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), Cambridge, Mass, Rosalie Bertell, GNSH., President, International Institute of Concern for Public Health, Toronto, Canada, Dr. Maria Minkova, 'Ekoglasnost', Friends of the Earth Bulgaria, Sofia, Commander Robert Green, RN (Retd.), Chair, World Court Project, UK, Janet Bloomfield, former chair CND, Saffron Walden Group Against Nuclear Weapons, England, Xanthe Hall, IPPNW Germany, Berlin, Solange Fernex, President, WILPF France, Paris, France, Vladimir Slivyak, Social-Ecological Union, Moscow, Oleg Bodrov, Chair, 'Green World', Sosnovy Bor, Leningrad Oblast, Russia, Andrey Sukhnev, Ecotourism Centre, Lake Baikal, Russia, Dr. Caroline Lucas, MEP, Greens Group,UK, European Parliament, Gorka Knorr Borrass, MEP, European Parliament, Steve Leeper, Transnet, Hiroshima, Japan., Marylia Kelley, Tri-Valley CARES, Livermore, Calif, Alice Slater, Global Resource and Action Centre for the Environment,(GRACE) New York, Carah Ong, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, Santa Barbara, Calif, Ellen Thomas, Proposition-One Committee, Washington DC, USA., Bob Musil, Executive Director, Physicians for Global Responsibility, (IPPNW USA), Washington DC., John Burroughs, Executive Director, Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy, (LCNP) N.Y., USA., Richard N. Salvador, Pacific Islands Association of NGOs, Honolulu, Hawaii, Donald C. Whitmore, President, Third Millenium Foundation, US., Joe Katz, President, Women's Action for New Directions (WAND), Metro Detroit, USA., Dana L. Richter PhD, Copper Country Peace Alliance, Houghton, Mich, USA., Troy Davis, President, World Citizen Foundation, Harvard, USA., Alastair Millar, Fourth Freedom Forum, Washington DC., USA., Bob Kinsey, Chair, Peace and Justice Task Force, United Church of Christ, Rocky Mountain Conference, USA., Michele Bisonette Robbins, Executive Director, Youth for Environment and Sanity (YES), Soquel, Ca, USA., Ruth Garbus, Director, New York Women of Vision and Action., NY., USA., Shiela Blaker, Blaine Metcalf, War Resisters League, San Luis Obispo, CA.,USA., Barbara Birkett,M.D.,President, Physicians for Global Survival (Canada) Michael Murphy, Inter-Church Uranium Educational Cooperative, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Prof. L. Terrell-Gardner, Past President, Science for Peace, Univ. of Toronto, Canada, Tryna Booth, Canadian Peace Alliance, Toronto, Canada., Marion Hancock, Coordinator, Peace Foundation Aotearoa/NZ, Auckland, NZ., John Hallam, Nuclear Campaigner, Friends of the Earth Australia (Sydney) Irene Gale AM, Babs Fuller- Quinn, Australian Peace Committee Dr. Susan Wareham President MAPW (Medical Association for Prevention of War- ) Canberra, Australia, Kirsten Blair, Mark Wakeham, Coordinators, Environment Centre of the Northern Territory, Grant Keady, Scientists and Technologists Against Nuclear Dumping, W.A., Dr. Carmen Lawrence, MP, Labor, Fremantle, W.A., Jill Hall, MP, Shortland, NSW.,
- Next by Date: L'Italia alle armi
- Next by thread: L'Italia alle armi
- Indice: