[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
(The Times) Albania: the wild frontier
- Subject: (The Times) Albania: the wild frontier
- From: Paola Lucchesi <paola.lucchesi at mail.inet.it>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:14:48 +0200
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,649-105805,00.html WEDNESDAY MARCH 28 2001 Albania: the wild frontier BY JAMES PETTIFER A plucky country battling its oppressors or a nation of gangsters? As Albanians again become the focus of a Balkan conflict, our reporter charts the turbulent history of a nation whose heroes include Norman Wisdom You know when you are flying over Albania; the roads in neighbouring Montenegro and Greece seem to come to a full stop and a ruddy moonscape of seemingly uninhabited mountains appears below. The bleak, and barren landscape is largely a legacy of years of isolation when Albania was one of the most Stalinist and secretive lands on earth at the height of the Cold War. The terrain and decades of obscurity have not been matched by lack of interest from would-be conquerors down the years, however; its location on the Adriatic Sea has made Albania a bridgehead for various nations and empires. Churchill once said that the Balkans produced more history than they could digest. The question now is whether some Albanians who dream of a Greater Albania will try to bite off more land than their neighbours can stomach. So do the rebel ethnic Albanians fighting in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and around the Kosovo border have history on their side? The modern state of Albania was born in 1913, emerging from the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after the Second Balkan War. Unlike many of its Balkan neighbours, it has not changed borders since it was established. But after Natos expulsion of Serbian forces from Kosovo in 1999, many expansionist ethnic Albanians in the region have been spurred to seek more land. Albanians, who call themselves sons of eagles are descended from the Ancient Illyrians, who lived all over the southwest Balkans. In Ottoman times they flourished and were a favoured people who gave the Empire many grand viziers (prime ministers). But since its birth, Albania has never been large or economically viable enough to support all the ethnic Albanians in the region. By the end of the First World War large numbers of ethnic Albanians were spread throughout northern Greece, Macedonia and what was then royalist Yugoslavia. Indeed, Britain was among the Great Powers that handed Kosovo to the Serb-led Yugoslavs, a fact that was to become a source of friction for decades until the Nato campaign to drive out hardline Serbs two years ago. The severe ethnic tensions in towns such as modern Tetovo also date from the post-First World War period. After 1920, more than 100,000 mostly Serb colonists moved into Macedonia and Kosovo and formed a ruling elite above the mostly Albanian Muslim majority. Why did this happen? As always in the Balkans, Great Power rivalries played a role. Serbia was for decades the Balkan nationality favoured by France and Britain, while Bulgaria was linked to Germany. Albanias best friend was Austria; it is possible that without Austrian insistence in 1913 no modern Albanian state would exist. But after the First World War, Albania was left friendless. Chunks of historic Albanian land, particularly Kosovo and Western Macedonia, with its rich mines, were given to Serbia, so under the Versailles Treaty about half the Albanian population was left outside the new but tiny Albanian state. British and French Balkan policy was intent on building up a strong Serbia as the dominant nationality within Yugoslavia. That changed after the rise of Slobodan Milosevic in Serbia and the break-up of federal Yugoslavia from 1991. Serbia became a pariah state and, despite the ousting of Milosevic last October, Serbs still have a long way to go before gaining full international approval. After the Second World War, Albania became the political equivalent of the dark side of the moon during the rule of the Stalinist Enver Hoxha, who died in 1985. It emerged from decades of isolation with the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in 1989 only to descend into near-anarchy, with a reputation as a nation of bandits. This was reinforced by the pyramid savings scandal of 1996-1997, which caused widespread bankruptcy and led to the fall of the Government. Some say todays expansionism is a direct consequence of this collapse: so many Albanians were left destitute that they had to look beyond their borders for economic recovery. So will the new international orientations bring a change of Albanian borders and a greater Albania? Although the international community says it supports Macedonia, it remains to be seen what this really means. The Albanians have the great advantage of a new economic space, based on the collapse of the communist borders with Kosovo, Montenegro and Macedonia. They also have a young population with hardcurrency income from a diaspora totally committed to the free market world. Serbia and Macedonia have yet to show that they really have this commitment. Albania, for all its terrible infrastructure and social problems, may have found the key to the future, while the neighbouring Slavs have yet to make a really decisive break with the communist past.
- Prev by Date: (AFP) Macedonian chases rebels, ponders social change
- Next by Date: Re: emergenza Jugoslavia
- Previous by thread: (AFP) Macedonian chases rebels, ponders social change
- Next by thread: R: emergenza Jugoslavia
- Indice: