[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
An information from Zimbabwe
ANB-BIA - Av. Charles Woeste 184 - 1090 Bruxelles - Belg
TEL **.32.2/420 34 36 fax /420 05 49 E-Mail: anb-bia@village.uunet.be
_____________________________________________________________
WEEKLY NEWS SPECIAL ISSUE of: 28-07-2002
INFORMATION FROM ZIMBABWE
A friend of ours in Zimbabwe sent us the following information about their
impending famine. We were asked to spread this information as widely as we can.
If you like, you can reply directly to his own address: <bmacgarry@mango.zw>
Greetings
Paolo Costantini (anb-bia)
------
Dear Friends
It seems necessary to write to everyone possible about our impending famine.
The situation is complicated by a number of factors. The rains have been
bad. The total maize crop was less than 400,00 tonnes, between a half and a
third of what the peasant farmers usually produce in a year. The commercial
farmers, of whose problems you hear so much, normally produce much less
than that; about 30-40% of the total crop. Removing them from the scene
need not cause any problem in direct food production in a good year, but
this was not a good year - in fact the worst since 1947. The disruptions
caused by the land takeovers and the violence associated with the
presidential election campaign must have contributed to the present problem.
But there has been no famine in history that was not man-made. The Irish
potato famine of the 1840s is a well-documented case, with the country
exporting wheat during the famine, while peasants, dependent on their
potato crop, starved and left the country in their millions. In our case,
the people in control of the state machinery (we don't have a government:
the `results' of the presidential election this year were illegitimate, and
the legitimacy of ZANU-PF's claim to have won a majority in the
parliamentary elections of 2000 are still sub judice, while `president'
Mugabe has not even appointed a new cabinet as the constitution requires
since the presidential election in March) are planning to make people and
communities who voted against them in March starve first. I doubt whether
they have the capacity to limit the damage to that.
However, there are international factors connected with `globalisation' and
its effect on food security. The Zimbabwe government, before the 2000
elections, decided not to allow the import of genetically-modified seed.
That was a right decision, given the proven danger of infection of non-GM
crops. Our previously flourishing seed maize industry exported hybrid maize
adapted to the African environment widely throughout the region, and if
that became contaminated, we would lose that market. The whole region would
become dependent on US genetically-modified seed.
In this light, we need to read the report from Reuters on 23 July that: In
June the United States said it gave Zimbabwe 8,500 tons of maize but a
further 10,000 tons was rejected because it did not have a certificate
saying it had not been genetically modified. Despite the fact that Andrew
Meldrum corrected this information in the London `Guardian' early in June,
this story still circulates. The fact is that the 8,500 tonnes that were
accepted were not grain, but meal. The later 10,000 tonnes were grain, i.e.
GM seed. The US say in the same Reuters report that they only have GM maize
to offer. If they are serious, they could mill the grain and send it as
meal. That would be accepted.
If the food was made available, we would still have to deal with the
problem of partisan distribution and targeted famine. It is most important
that the US and the former colonial powers don't take the lead in putting
any pressure that is necessary; the UN Food Programme is the proper agency
to do that, along with private donor agencies, who have a right to see
where their aid is going (we had a visit from the overseas director of
Christian Aid last month for this purpose). International law limits what
foreign governments can do.
I can only hope that, if the situation does get really bad, when the South
African government does intervene they will be met with sympathy elsewhere.
Famine here on the scale we expect would mean vast numbers of refugees
fleeing to neighbouring countries, especially South Africa: in defence of
their own economic security, they would have to intervene. The West may
applaud such action, but they will not, on their record, offer any help in
the appropriate way, to the country forc ed to intervene. Remember that,
when Tanzania was invaded by Idi Amin's Ugandan army in 1979 and their
defensive campaign led to their removing Amin from power, a move which was
welcomed by all Uganda's neighbours, Tanzania did not receive a penny of
aid from the West to compensate for the vast expense of such a war to such
a poor country.
Please spread this information as widely as you can.
Brian MacGarry sj
Zambuko House
12 Fern Road
Hatfield
Harare
Zimbabwe
phone: +263-4 571174
e-mail: bmacgarry@mango.zw