[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AMNESTY: The Inter-Congolese Dialogue, an opportunity to puthuman rights on the agenda
- To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
- Subject: AMNESTY: The Inter-Congolese Dialogue, an opportunity to puthuman rights on the agenda
- From: Congosol - servizio informazioni <congosol@neomedia.it>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:01:49 +0100
12 March 2002
AI Index AFR 62/003/2002 - News Service Nr. 44
Democratic Republic of Congo:
The Inter-Congolese Dialogue, an opportunity to put human rights on the agenda
Amnesty International called today in a memorandum to the parties in
the ongoing peace talks on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC),
known as the Inter-Congolese Dialogue, in Sun City, South Africa, for
a binding commitment that justice and human rights will be at the
heart of all agreements reached.
"The Dialogue provides an opportunity not only to end the fighting in
the DRC but also to set up a framework in which the rule of law can
be established and in which human rights may be protected," it said.
'The dialogue is both about building a better future for the
Congolese people and about righting the wrongs of the past. The
success of the Dialogue should be measured against agreement to end
impunity for human rights abuses committed by the country's nationals
or foreign forces."
In the memorandum -- Democratic Republic of Congo: Memorandum to the
Inter-Congolese Dialogue: Amnesty International's recommendations for
a human rights agenda -- the organization stresses that there can be
no lasting peace without justice and accountability for violations -
past and present - of human rights and international humanitarian law.
For many decades, the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo
(DRC) have suffered a seemingly unbreakable cycle of human rights
abuses by agents of governments and armed political groups.
The late 1990s witnessed a catastrophic deterioration in the human
rights situation and the perpetration of abuses on an unprecedented
scale. The 1996-7 armed conflict which ousted President Mobutu and
brought Laurent-Désiré Kabila to power resulted in hundreds of
thousands of deaths, the majority of them unarmed civilians.
A subsequent armed conflict which broke out in August 1998 between
armed opposition groups and the Government is estimated to have cost
over two million lives so far, also mostly civilians.
"Most of the abuses, particularly extrajudicial executions and other
deliberate and arbitrary killings, "disappearances", arbitrary
arrests, unlawful detentions and torture, including rape, have
continued largely because they were ordered or condoned by political
or security force leaders with responsibility to prevent them.
Perpetrators are rarely, if ever, brought to justice," Amnesty
International said.
The peace talks in Sun City are primarily intended to bring an end to
the armed conflict and to agree on a new political dispensation for
the DRC. However, Amnesty International believes that no firm
foundation can be built for the country's future peace and stability
unless mechanisms are agreed upon to identify and bring to justice
perpetrators of human rights abuses in the context of armed conflicts.
Amnesty International's recommendations include:
incorporating human rights protection in the Lusaka Cease-fire Agreement;
ending the use of, as well as demobilising and rehabilitating, child soldiers;
setting up bodies to investigate and to bring perpetrators of past
human rights abuses to justice;
ensuring that those who have been involved in human rights abuses
will not be allowed to have political or security responsibilities
which they may use to commit further abuses;
reforming the judiciary and law enforcement to comply with
international human rights protection standards;
establishing an independent body to investigate future human rights abuses;
abolishing the death penalty;
and establishing mechanisms to prevent human rights abuses, including
unlawful killings, "disappearances", torture, arbitrary arrests,
unlawful detentions, discrimination and refoulement.
"It takes a wholehearted commitment by those in the Inter-Congolese
Dialogue to protect human rights. All those who seek to govern the
Democratic Republic of Congo should now commit themselves publicly to
making human rights a reality for all Congolese," Amnesty
International said.
BACKGROUND
The Inter-Congolese Dialogue is a major component of a Cease-fire
Agreement signed in July and August 1999 in Lusaka, the capital of
Zambia, by parties to the armed conflict that started in August 1998.
The Agreement was a culmination of mediation efforts and pressure by
foreign governments and inter-governmental organizations to end a war
in which several Congolese armed political groups, supported by
Burundian, Rwandese and Ugandan government forces, have been seeking
to overthrow the DRC Government which itself is supported by the
Angolan, Namibian and Zimbabwean government forces.
The Dialogue officially opened on 25 February, but substantive talks
were delayed for one week as delegates wrangled over the eligibility
of certain participants and the framework for discussions.
There are some 350 delegates participating in the Dialogue,
representing armed political groups, the DRC government, civil
society and the unarmed political opposition. The talks are scheduled
to last for 45 days.
Amnesty International is seeking to ensure that the Dialogue will
engender a break with a past characterized by widespread human rights
abuses.
NB:
This report summarizes a 51-page document: "Democratic Republic of
Congo: Memorandum to the Inter-Congolese Dialogue: Amnesty
International's recommendations for a human rights agenda (AI Index:
AFR 62/030/2001)" issued by Amnesty International in November 2001.
Further details are available at http://www.amnesty.org
\ENDS
====================================================
Servizio informazioni Congosol
http://www.neomedia.it/personal/Congosol/1.html
The material contained in this communication may not be taken always
to reflect the views of the Service.
Willing to offer you these informations quickly, the Service makes
the choice of being not always able to verify them, and couldn't be
held responsible for the accuracy of the original sources.
We apologize for any cross posting.
====================================================