Gilad Atzmon: Proxy and Proximity

[mary <humdrum2 at libero.it>]

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

http://peacepalestine.blogspot.com/2007/12/gilad-atzmon-proxy-and-proximity.html

Gilad Atzmon - Proxy and Proximity

 When the Levy Breaks: in the photo,
Tony Blair and Lord Levy enjoying a carefree moment.

Back in October 2003 the Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad
gave a speech at the Organization of the Islamic Conference summit
wherein he
said
that “Jews rule the world by proxy…. they get others to fight and die for
them."

These very alarming, yet explicit, statements made by a head of state
drew some harsh criticism from
state
leaders as well as from influential Jews around the world who warned
that it could spark more violence against Jews.

Clearly, the anticipated anti-Semitic tidal wave has yet to make it to
any recognized shore. However, we have recently learned that more or less
around the same time PM Mahathir that was speaking to his fellow Islamic
leaders, in another continent, located at pretty much the other side of
the planet, in a country that was already engaged in some fierce fighting
to maintain Israel’s regional interests and hegemony, two prominent
Zionist tycoons met the British Prime Minister for a ‘drink’. According
to the

Daily Telegraph, at a central London Hotel “David Abrahams, the
property developer…entered a room already packed with Cabinet ministers
and the party's most prized donors. Moments after arriving, Mr Abrahams
was spotted across the crowded room by Lord Levy, the party's chief
fundraiser. The Labour peer immediately left his group and swept over to
greet Mr Abrahams like a long-lost friend with none other than Tony Blair
in tow.”

We learned as well that David Abrahams, who had been affiliated then with
the two rabid Zionist lobbies (‘Labour
Friends of Israel‘ as well the
‘
Jewish Labour‘) had donated £650.000 to the Labour Party by proxy,
using other people’s names. This happened around the time the Labour
Party took Britain into an illegal war based on a ‘sexed up’ WMD dossier,
that according to some reports was partially

put together in

Israel.

Some would have liked to think that the time proximity between Abrahams’
unlawful activity and the Iraq invasion were a coincidence but then, last
week Abrahams admitted to the

JC (Jewish Chronicle) that “he had made his donations secretly so as
to avoid accusations of his being part of a ‘Jewish conspiracy’.”
Abrahams foolishly admitted that he was aware that his conduct could have
been interpreted as a ‘Jewish conspiracy’. In fact, I myself think that
it is far worse. In a recent piece I have argued that considering the
British people’s public opposition to the war, and taking into account
the scale of devastation this war brought on the Iraqi people, Abrahams’,
Levy’s and their friends’ interference with British politics is no less
than a
‘
plot against the British People’.

And yet, I must admit that David Abrahams is a charming geezer. If he
weren’t there, someone would have had to invent him. Being a chatterer,
he just cannot stop himself from speaking his mind and sharing his
authentic concerns with the rest of the world. Abrahams is probably one
of the best glimpses we have ever had into the mind of a Zionist
lobbyist.

Following Abrahams’ JC confession, we probably are entitled to deduce
that unlawful conduct is OK as long as no one really knows about it.
Abrahams, obviously succumbed to the most literal pragmatic
interpretation of the liberal legalistic understanding of innocence: ‘One
is innocent until proved otherwise’. This interpretation is commonly used
by criminals and gangsters in their first press conferences.

However, gangsters tend to cling to this argument before they are fully
indicted or confronted with real evidence related to their crimes. In
most cases, gangsters are aware of the notion of ethics and its
implications. Though they tend not to employ or follow ethical judgments,
they recognize the possibility that other beings may do just that.
Abrahams, on the other hand, seems to be totally foreign to the notion of
ethics and any form of moral thinking. As he himself revealed in the JC
article, it wasn’t the non-ethical behavior that concerned him, but
rather what the Goyim may say. Rather than trying to explain why he
unlawfully shoved money to a political party, he attempted to tell us why
he did it in secrecy. The only way to interpret Abrahams’ strange
confession is to remember that the sleaze master tycoon was talking to
the leading British Jewish weekly. It is rather possible that he was
trying to calm his fellow Jewish brothers down by addressing their
serious and justified concerns. Abrahams spoke to the JC believing that
the Goyim (Guardian, Independent and the BBC) may never notice what he
had to say. He was evidently wrong. At the moment, for some obvious
reasons, the Jewish press is closely monitored. In fact, the Guardian
reported about Abrahams’ confession to the JC a day before JC made it to
the news shops.

However, now Abrahams has been exposed, and as we learn from the Daily
Telegraph’s article above, the Sadchen (matchmaker) in this disastrous
affair was no other than Lord Levy, the Labour ‘honorary cash machine’.
This all happened at the early days of the Iraqi invasion at the time
British soldiers were fighting and giving their lives to reduce the last
defiant enemies of Israel into dust.

I have good reason to believe that Back in October 2003, Prime Minister
Mahathir Mohamad didn’t know much about Lord Levy and Tycoon Abrahams,
thus when he said that “Jews rule the world by proxy” he was just
guessing and exaggerating. Let’s face the facts PM Mohamad: Jews do not
run the world by proxy, they just run the Labour Party (by
proxy).


***

Interestingly enough, amongst my many sins, back in May 2003, a few days
after Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” speech I was performing a short
musical set in a Bar Mitzvah in Northwest London. Just before my set a
Rabbi performed a Torah spiritual oratory spectacle in which he
said:

“Never in our (Jewish) history have we endured such a great victory with
such a little effort.”

The Rabbi’s moral was rather clear yet at the same time devastating:
‘once again we (the Jews) have managed ‘to get others to fight and die
for us’. Like PM Mahathir, the Rabbi was obviously misinformed, in fact
he was guessing. At the time the he couldn’t know about the serious
‘efforts’ made by Lord Levy and Proxy donator Mr Abrahams. He didn’t know
that some Jewish tycoons invested big money in secrecy towards what was
mistakenly seen at the time as ‘effortless victory’.

In an old paper
of mine I tried to grasp the metaphysics of Zionist global
lobbying:
“…there is no geographical centre to the Zionist endeavour.” I said
there. “It is hard to determine where the centre of Zionist decision
making is. Is it in Jerusalem? In the Knesset? …. In the Mossad? Or maybe
in the Anti-Defamation League offices in America? It might as well be
somewhere in Wall Street. Who knows?”

But then, it is of course more than possible that there is no decision
making process at all. The beauty of a network operative system is that
not a single operator within the network is fully familiar with the full
scope of the network but is only aware of his personal role within it.
This is probably the biggest strength of the Zionist movement.”

Abrahams and Levy probably didn’t conspire, it is even possible that they
themselves didn’t know what they were buying. They acted separately and
autonomously within a network. This network is very powerful and it is
capable of achieving a lot, yet, when things go wrong, they can as well
go terribly wrong. This is exactly the kind of concerns Abrahams shared
with the JC the other day. It is the fear of the ‘other’, the deep sense
of genuine Jewish guilt. When Abrahams told the JC “I didn’t want Jewish
money and the Labour Party being put together”, it was clear that at
least in his Jewish symbolic universe ‘Jewish money’ had some bad
connotations while the Labor Party was associated with some glamorous
power.

Deep in his heart, Abrahams didn’t feel good. Unfortunately, it wasn’t
morality that concerned him but rather being seen as a conspirator by one
Goy or another. Abrahams probably knows that Prime Minister Mahathir
Mohamad wasn’t guessing or following the anti-Semite devil within him.
‘There was a proxy operation in place’ …. and at least momentarily other
people happen to fight and die in the Zionist wars. In Abrahams’ favour
it should be said that it seems as if he genuinely feels bad about it.

Labels:

Atzmon,

Israel,

lobbying,
UK