[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
Fw: Emergency Petition to the Security Council
- Subject: Fw: Emergency Petition to the Security Council
- From: "Paolo Candelari" <paolocand at inwind.it>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:58:38 +0100
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eli Pariser, MoveOn.org" <moveon-help at list.moveon.org> To: "paolo candelari" <paolocand at inwind.it> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:33 AM Subject: Emergency Petition to the Security Council > Dear MoveOn member, > > We've launched an emergency petition from citizens around the > world to the U.N. Security Council. We'll be delivering the > list of signers and your comments to the 15 member states of > the Security Council on THURSDAY, MARCH 6. > > If hundreds of thousands of us sign, it could be an enormously > important and powerful message -- people from all over the > world joining in a single call for a peaceful solution. But > we really need your help, and soon. Please sign and ask your > friends and colleagues to sign TODAY at: > > http://www.moveon.org/emergency/ > > In the next week, the U.N. Security Council will likely meet > to decide on authorizing a war against Iraq. If the Council > votes to accept a second resolution, it'll be very difficult > to avert a war. But if the resolution doesn't get enough > votes, it'll be a major setback for the Bush Administration's > plans to invade and occupy Iraq. > > In the United States and around the world, millions of us > oppose a war against Iraq. We believe that tough inspections > can disarm Saddam Hussein without the loss of a single life. > This week may represent our last chance to win without war. > > The stakes couldn't really be much higher. A war with Iraq > could kill tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians and inflame > the Middle East. According to current plans, it would require > an American occupation of the country for years to come. And > it could escalate in ways that are horrifying to imagine. > > We can stop this tragedy from unfolding. But we need to speak > together, and we need to do so now. Let's show the Security > Council what world citizens think. You can add your voice at: > > http://www.moveon.org/emergency/ > > Then please ask your friends, family, colleagues, > acquaintances -- anyone you know who shares this concern -- to > sign on today. As the New York Times put it, "there may still > be two superpowers on the planet: the United States and world > public opinion." The Bush Administration's been flexing its > muscles. Now let's flex ours. > > Sincerely, > --Eli Pariser > International Campaigns Director > MoveOn.org > March 3rd, 2003 > > P.S. Here's the letter we'll be delivering to the Security > Council members along with the petition: > > Dear Member of the U.N. Security Council, > > We are citizens from countries all over the world. We are > speaking together because we will all be affected by a > decision in which your country has a major part -- the > decision of how to disarm Iraq. > > The first reason for its existence listed in the Preamble to > the Charter of the United Nations is "to save succeeding > generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our > lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind." If your > country supports a Security Council resolution that would > authorize a war on Iraq, you will directly contradict that > charter. You will be supporting an unnecessary war -- a > war which immediately, and in its unknown consequences, > could bring "untold sorrow to mankind" once again. > > The U.N. was created to enable peaceful alternatives to > conflict. The weapons inspections under way are a perfect > example of just such an alternative, and their growing > success is a testament to the potential power the U.N. holds. > By supporting tough inspections instead of war, you can show > the world a real way to resolve conflict without bloodshed. > But if you back a war, it will undermine the very premise > upon which the U.N. was built. > > President Bush argues that only by endorsing a war on Iraq > can the United Nations prove its relevance. We argue the > opposite. If the Security Council allows itself to be > completely swayed by one member nation, in the face of viable > alternatives, common sense and world public opinion, then it > will be diminished in its role, effectiveness, and in the > opinion of humankind. > > We do not support this war. For billions of citizens in > hundreds of countries, and for the future generations whose > lives will be shaped by the choice you make, we ask that you > stand firm against the pressuring of the Bush Administration, > and support tough inspections for Iraq. The eyes of the > world are on you. > > Sincerely, > [Number] citizens of the world. > > ________________ > > This is a message from MoveOn.org. To remove yourself from > this list, please visit our subscription management page at: > http://moveon.org/s?i=1127-1012802-26x8FK5C.jZupP1TmtBt3g >
- Prev by Date: il mercato nero dell'informazione
- Next by Date: Nuova campagna di critica dei consumi
- Previous by thread: il mercato nero dell'informazione
- Next by thread: Nuova campagna di critica dei consumi
- Indice: