[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
Fw: UPDATE to... The "Anaconda" Embarrassment (TiM Bulletin 2002/3-2,Mar 14, 2002)
- Subject: Fw: UPDATE to... The "Anaconda" Embarrassment (TiM Bulletin 2002/3-2,Mar 14, 2002)
- From: "Nello Margiotta" <animarg at tin.it>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:03:59 +0100
FROM PHOENIX, ARIZONA Here is an update to our latest Truth in Media Global Watch Bulletin which is now available at our Web site. Just click on the animated (green) THE NEWS button to go to our latest report. Of course, you can also click on the TiM Bulletins Index button in the left frame - to go to selections of our Bulletins archived by geographic regions and subjects, and in chronological order. Or click on any other button in the left frame for other topics of interest. And now, here are the headlines of the latest TiM Bulletin. Just keep in mind that our stories are CONSTANTLY updated, and that the e-mail text enclosed below is often merely the first edition of a story. So we recommend that you keep checking the TiM Web site daily, so that you would not miss out on some important news or commentary updates. Here is an UPDATE to the latest TiM Bulletin: HIGHLIGHTS Afghanistan 1a. More "Anaconda" Embarrassments: No Sleeping Bags for Mountain Duty Women and Children Killed by U.S. Bombs; Ex-spy chief: Al Qaida has U.S. prisoners To read the latest update and all the LINKS to the above stories, just click (or double-click, depending on your computer) on the following Web address, and you'll be able to see it in full color, along with accompanying images: http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins2002/3-2.html 1a. More "Anaconda" Embarrassments: No Sleeping Bags for Mountain Duty More Women and Children Killed by U.S. Bombs; Ex-spy chief: Al Qaeda Has U.S. Prisoners WASHINGTON, Mar. 13 - The "Anaconda" embarrassments that we described in Item 1 of this TiM Bulletin were far from an exception in Afghanistan. Here's, for example, an excerpt from a Mar. 10 Associated Press report, quoting comments made by some U.S. troops who had just returned from the battle zone: BAGRAM, Afghanistan (AP) -- Exhausted and muddy, hundreds of U.S. soldiers returned from an eight-day battle in the mountains Sunday as the military said the few remaining enemy forces were hunkering down in caves. [.] The Chinooks flew in low in formation over the valley beside the base. With the helicopter blades still turning, visibly relieved soldiers carrying huge backpacks and heavy machine guns hopped out and walked slowly toward their comrades. U.S. troops arriving here said they had not expected to find so many Taliban and al-Qaida forces waiting for them when they moved into the rugged mountains of Paktia province on March 2. The soldiers were unprepared for the subfreezing temperatures at 10,000 feet -- some said they hadn't even brought sleeping bags. They spoke of staying awake at night and sleeping by day when it was warmer. There were cases of hypothermia, they said, and drinking water would freeze (emphasis added by TiM). Our defense budget has already soared to about $343 billion per year. But that was not enough for the "death merchants" Washington stooges, such as George Bush and Dick Cheney, Wasting no time for a chance to gouge the flag-waving public, the Bush administration has already marshaled huge increases in our nation's defense spending (an additional $59 billion in fiscal 2003 alone; $675 billion over the next 10 years - see the chart in the TiM Bulletin Bush League All-Stars (Feb 3, 2002). And now, we discover that our fighting men in the Afghanistan mountains were not even issued sleeping bags! That's far worse than the $500 hammers that the Pentagon of the 1970s had reportedly purchased. This is incompetence laced with criminal neglect. How many troops did the Pentagon lose or injure because of it? It all goes to show us that the price of stupidity is infinite; that no amount of additional spending will protect this nation and our troops from incompetence of our leaders. Nor the civilian population of the countries that Washington's New World Order juggernauts choose to target. As we were writing The "Anaconda" Embarrassment report, the news broke that our mighty warriors manage to kill some more innocent Afghan women and children. Here an excerpt from a Mar. 13 Associated Press report: Women and children were among 14 people killed in a U.S. airstrike in eastern Afghanistan last week, military officials said. A wounded child survived and was reported in stable condition at a military hospital. U.S. officials believe the 15 people in the vehicle were linked in some way to the al-Qaida terror network, Central Command spokesman Lt. Col. Martin Compton said Tuesday. Their vehicle was attacked by two U.S. fighter jets on the morning of March 6 in eastern Afghanistan, the command said. Officials at both the Pentagon and the Central Command, which is responsible for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, said Tuesday they still lacked key details about the incident. Officials said they did not know how many women and children were among the 14 killed, whether they were Afghans or the kind of vehicle attacked. The fighters attacked the vehicle after it left what Compton described as a compound known to be used by al-Qaida members. The compound was in Paktia province near the border with Pakistan and close to the Afghan village of Shikin, Compton said.. Asked why the incident was not disclosed earlier, Compton said U.S. military officials needed time to piece together what happened before making the announcement. U.S. officials have said repeatedly during the five-month war that they take special precautions to minimize civilian casualties. Pentagon officials have said that is important to counter propaganda by al-Qaida and their Taliban allies that the U.S. war is targeting innocent Muslims. Sure thing. just as NATO "made sure" they did not target "innocent Serbs" in 1999, while destroying the country's civilian infrastructure, and killing more than 1,000 civilians, 79 of them children - the "collateral damage." Was the above incident an exception? Hardly. We've even killed our own allies assuming they were the Taliban or Al Qaeda. On Feb. 21, for example, nearly one month after one such incident, the Secretary of Defense was forced to eat crow in public. Here's an excerpt from a New York Times (Feb. 22) report: WASHINGTON, Feb. 21 Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said today that 16 Afghan fighters killed by American troops north of Kandahar last month were not members of the Taliban or Al Qaeda. While he described the deaths as "unfortunate," he issued no apology and said there was no reason for disciplinary action. In describing the results of the official inquiry into the Special Forces mission, Mr. Rumsfeld said the United States alone generated the intelligence that pointed to two compounds in the Hazar Qadam Valley as enemy garrisons. Evidence has been mounting that the two raids, carried out overnight on Jan. 23, resulted in deaths and detainment of fighters loyal to the new interim Afghan government. Some officials had speculated that the United States might have been duped into mounting the attacks by false information from rival warlords. A number of questions remained unanswered today officials said Mr. Rumsfeld himself asked for clarification on some points from the United States Central Command and certain details contradicted reports from villagers in Hazar Qadam, including assertions that 21 people died in the raid. And then there were strikes against purely civilian targets, such as some residential neighborhoods in Kabul that were hit in late October. Here's an excerpt from an Oct. 29 Associated Press report: Errant Bombs Reportedly Kill Some 13 Afghan Civilians KABUL, Afghanistan (AP), Oct. 29 - American airstrikes meant to punish the Taliban spilled over Sunday (Oct. 28) into residential neighborhoods of the Afghan capital, killing 13 civilians, witnesses said. It was the second time in as many days that missiles have accidentally hit homes and killed residents. Later Sunday, U.S. jets were back over the skies of the beleaguered Afghan capital, and strong explosions could be heard in the direction of the main road from Kabul to the opposition-controlled Bagram air base (now in American hands - TiM Ed.). Weeping families buried their dead hours after the morning bombardment, apparently aimed at Taliban targets to the north and east of Kabul. "I have lost all my family. I am finished," said a sobbing woman in the Qali Hotair neighborhood on Kabul's northern edge. In Washington, Pentagon spokesmen had no immediate comment on the latest strikes and civilian casualties involved. It has stressed repeatedly that civilians are never deliberately targeted. [.] In Sunday morning's airstrikes, witnesses said 10 people were killed in the Qali Hotair area. An Associated Press reporter saw six bodies, four of them children. A wailing father hugged the dead body of his son, who looked barely 2. Bereaved women slapped themselves with grief. Three other people died near an eastern housing complex called Macroyan, witnesses said. In Kabul's Wazir Akbar Khan Hospital, a semiconscious 13-year-old named Jawad did not yet know that all eight other people in his family had been killed. "He asked me, 'How is my family?'" said a neighbor, Mohammed Razi, ushering a journalist out of the boy's hospital room. "I said, 'They are all OK. You were walking in your sleep, and you fell down the well by your house, and I rescued you.'" [.] The strikes that hit Kabul came only 12 hours after stray bombs landed Saturday evening behind the rebel military alliance's battle lines north of the capital. Areas behind Taliban lines were also reported hit. Eight or nine civilians were killed - most of them in alliance-held areas, according to witnesses." Once again, such "collateral damage" tragedies are reminiscent of the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999. America's most-decorated living soldier, Col. David Hackworth, summed up the basic military doctrine of the cowardly war criminals who run the New World Order armies as follows: "Bomb the civilians and the civilian structures until that country's military can't stand to watch it anymore." (see "Hackworth," Sep. 1999) And just think - such crimes against humanity are being perpetrated in our name and with our money. But for the number of victims, what makes such state terrorism any better than the Al Qaeda kind? Speaking of Al Qaeda and their Afghan hosts, the Taliban, the UPI newswire reported that the enemy the Pentagon claimed to have defeated are actually holding some U.S. soldiers prisoner. Here is an excerpt: Ex-spy chief: Al Qaida has U.S. prisoners By Anwar Iqbal, UPI South Asian Affairs Analyst Published 3/13/2002 6:13 PM WASHINGTON, March 13 (UPI) -- A former Pakistani spymaster with links to the Taliban claims that al Qaida has captured American prisoners in eastern Afghanistan, forcing U.S. troops to end the siege of their stronghold and withdraw. U.S. officials have denied the claim. Talking to United Press International from his home in Islamabad, Gen. Hamid Gul, the former chief of Pakistan's main spy agency Inter Services Intelligence, said the United States sent "some Americans to Shahikot, dressed as Afghans." Shahikot is the mountainous region of eastern Afghanistan where U.S. forces and their Afghan allies taking part in "Operation Anaconda" have been bombing and fighting several hundred al Qaida and Taliban fighters holed up in a series of cave complexes since March 1. According to Gul the Americans sent to infiltrate the mountain strongholds could speak the local language of Pashto, and some even had beards. "The idea was to slip through the Taliban defenses into the al Qaida hideouts in the mountains. But they were detected and captured." Gul said this forced the Americans to make a deal with al Qaida and Taliban fighters and withdraw their troops. "The withdrawal of U.S. troops allowed most of the Taliban and al Qaida fighters to escape and melt away among the Pashtun tribesmen living in the area," said the Pakistani general. "I wonder what the Americans were trying to achieve with this Hollywood-style operation. Afghanistan is no Hollywood. It is a traditional tribal society where even a dog from another tribe is noticed by everyone." Gul also claimed that not many Taliban or al Qaida fighters were killed in eastern Afghanistan as there was "no face-to-face fighting" and the "bombing is not very effective against those hiding in the caves." Commenting on the claim of U.S. prisoners, Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clarke said: "We have no servicemen missing." "We have no information at all about any American being taken prisoner ... it is totally inaccurate," added a U.S. Central Command spokesman, Charles Portman.
- Prev by Date: emendamenti di Rifondazione in difesa della 185/90
- Next by Date: da Beirut
- Previous by thread: emendamenti di Rifondazione in difesa della 185/90
- Next by thread: da Beirut
- Indice: