[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
Fw: War on Terror Takes Trip to Philippines
- Subject: Fw: War on Terror Takes Trip to Philippines
- From: "Nello Margiotta" <animarg at tin.it>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:37:24 +0100
³We¹ll Have Some U.S. Special Forces and a Patrol Boat on the Side² Richard MacKinnon January 13,2002 In a January 11 Washington Post article, Pauline Jelinek of the Associated Press writes, ³American special forces are in the Philippines and at least 100 more will follow as the United States bolsters the Asian nation's defenses against radical Muslims linked to the al-Qaida network. ³With the war in Afghanistan in its third month, the dispatch of forces to the Philippines is an example of U.S. efforts to take the fight against terror elsewhere around the globe. ³About two dozen U.S. special forces are doing logistical and security planning for the larger force that could arrive within a week, a defense official said Thursday.² Yet, not everyone in the Philippines is happy about this arrangement nor are they satisfied that the stated agenda is the actual one. AKBAYAN Chairperson, Walden Bello, claims ³that the Macapagal-Arroyo administration has brought Philippine foreign policy back to the stone age of the 1950¹s and 1960¹s, when Malacanang automatically identified the Philippine national interest with that of the United States. National Security Adviser Roilo Golez has even gone on record stating that the administration is willing to let US forces to stay in the country during the entire duration of the anti-terrorist campaign, which, as the US Defense Department has admitted, may last years! What is this but an invitation to Washington to establish a permanent military presence, which our people rejected when they expelled the bases in 1991. ³But a failure to discern what is our national interest is not the only reason for the administration¹s behavior. There is also a mercenary reason, and that is to trade unqualified military support in exchange for aid and loans from Washington. India, Indonesia, and Pakistan have already been bought in different ways by Washington to get them into the military alliance, and the Philippine government feels it too must have its slice of the American pie.² Indeed, the agreement specifies $100 million in U.S. military and law enforcement aid as well as hundreds of millions more in food aid, debt cancellation, trade guarantees, poverty reduction programs. Bello also says that, ³the government should try to persuade Washington to address not the symptoms but the roots of terrorism, which lie in its 50-year-old policy of subordinating the interests of the peoples of the Middle East to its untrammeled access to oil to sustain its high-consumption, petroleum-intensive civilization and in its unstinting support for Israel, a state born out of the massive dispossession of the Palestinian people from their lands and country. Malacanang should be devoting its efforts to convincing Washington that unless the US ceases to stand in the way of arrangements that promote equity, justice, and national sovereignty in the Middle East, there will always be thousands of people who willing to step into the shoes of Osama bin Laden. ³Moreover, the best contribution that the Philippines can make to the international struggle against terrorism is not to participate in ill-conceived foreign adventures but to address the roots of domestic terrorism, the most important of which have to do with the historical injustices perpetrated on the Moro people in Mindanao. Only a resolution that promotes justice, equity, and self-determination for the Moro people will lead to a lasting solution to the terrorist problem in the country. Concentrating on police and military solutions will lead to failure locally, as it will lead to failure globally.² Despite the concerns of groups like the Citizens¹ Action Party the war on terror has spread to another front. Gen. Diomedio Villanueva, Philippines' military chief of staff, said Wednesday that U.S. military advisers will be allowed to join front-line Filipino troops. His statement was the first by a senior Philippine military official that U.S. forces would be allowed in battle areas. Along with the human resources, the Philippines has received equipment including a C-130 transport plane, eight UH-1 Huey helicopters and 30,000 rifles, the Pentagon says. Officials are expecting a patrol boat in the coming months. It would be remiss to not say that the Filipino military thinks it¹s getting a lot out of this arrangement. Perhaps, Canada can follow its lead. After all, we are letting in more FBI agents and it looks like we¹ll be allowing U.S. border agents to carry side arms. If we let the customs agents carry automatics and maybe reopen the American base in Newfoundland do you think the U.S. will replace our Sea King helicopters?
- Prev by Date: Fw: [ANSWER]: UNITED STATES REFUSES TO ABIDE BY GENEVA CONVENTION
- Next by Date: Fw: GUANTANAMO!
- Previous by thread: Fw: [ANSWER]: UNITED STATES REFUSES TO ABIDE BY GENEVA CONVENTION
- Next by thread: Fw: GUANTANAMO!
- Indice: