[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: [ANSWER] Emergency Iraq Protests
----- Original Message -----
From: "A.N.S.W.E.R." <answer@action-mail.org>
To: <ANSWER.general@organizerweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:20 AM
Subject: [ANSWER] Emergency Iraq Protests
> *EMERGENCY IRAQ PROTESTS*
>
> NATIONALLY-COORDINATED DAYS OF ACTION
> Friday, April 9 - Monday, April 12
>
> To demand:
> - U.S. OUT OF IRAQ
> - Bring the Troops Home Now
> - Money for jobs, education and healthcare - Not for wars
> of aggression
>
> *Call initiated by the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition*
>
> See below for details of protests in New York City,
> Washington DC, San Francisco and Los Angeles, downloadable
> flyers, and a link to a form to list your city's action on
> the website and in future emails.
>
> * * * * *
>
> IRAQ AT THE BOILING POINT
>
> The Iraqi revolt against occupation is spreading in
> qualitative developments. The Pentagon is reacting with a
> murderous iron fist that is making the popular Iraqi
> position increasingly clear to the world: that the
> occupation forces are indeed an enemy - not liberators.
>
> In the last 72 hours, as the colonial force attempts to
> hold the country in a tight grip, the number of casualties
> has mounted, as Iraqi cities are besieged and bombed by
> missiles and tanks. Street fighting is raging throughout
> the country.
>
> In a classic demonstration of colonial practices, the U.S.
> is conducting a widespread reign of terror. In fact, the
> U.S. and its allies are now conducting military operations
> in Ramadi, Baghdad, Basra, Mosul, Sadr, Adamiya, Kufa,
> Kut, Karabla, Amarah, Kirkuk, Mosul, Nasiriyah, Shula, and
> other cities and towns. The city of Fallujah has been
> exceptionally targeted. This is the same city where in the
> first weeks of the occupation U.S. troops took over a
> local school and killed 15 residents who were protesting
> the takeover of the facility.
>
> Yet, this is not exactly George W. Bush's Vietnam. During
> Vietnam it took years for the majority of the people and
> most soldiers to turn against the war. This time, the
> people of the United States have learned within the span
> of only one year that the war against Iraq is not only
> based on outright fabrications and lies. One year after
> the occupation, and even before, the people of this
> country and the world are and have been turning against
> the occupation and the warmakers.
>
> Although an allegation has been made that this is isolated
> "trouble" within a "Sunni Triangle," the revolt is in
> reality over an entire Iraqi rectangle encompassing nearly
> all areas - from north to south. Over the past three days,
> the previously simmering rejection of foreign occupation
> has evolved into a near full-scale revolt that has spread
> to many cities in the south of Iraq. All while the U.S.
> has implemented collective punishment against the people
> of Fallujah and other cities in the central part of the
> country.
>
> In a predictable attempt at molding public opinion, the
> U.S. media continues to use racist stereotyping to
> characterize those who are resisting. The constant
> designation of the Iraqi people as "Sunnis" or "Shiites"
> is carefully calculated language designed to conceal the
> single most important fact: that the Iraqi people (Sunni
> and Shiite) believe that their country has been seized by
> foreign imperialist occupying forces and that they - as
> one people - are fighting to evict them.
>
> If the analogy with Vietnam has validity, it is this: U.S.
> political leaders, again emboldened by arrogance and drunk
> with power, falsely believe that their possession of high
> tech weapons is sufficient to subdue small Third World
> countries seeking independence and sovereignty. The words
> associated with Vietnam - "debacle," "quagmire," etc. -
> are certainly apt for Bush's war and the occupation of
> Iraq.
>
> But there are fundamental differences between the war in
> Vietnam and Iraq. The most important one being that the
> United States could, at the end of the day, disengage from
> Southeast Asia and withdraw from Vietnam. The policy
> planners and decision makers for the U.S. imperial
> establishment know full well that the United States
> military, political and economic structures will never
> voluntarily withdraw from Western Asia and Northern
> Africa, also known as the Middle East.
>
> This is where the oil is. Not just in Iraq, but also
> throughout the Gulf region where two-thirds of the world's
> known petroleum reserves are located. This region is also
> the gateway to the rapidly expanding economies of East and
> Southeast Asia, the northern entrance to the African
> continent from Europe, and the where several strategic
> waterways are located: the Suez Canal, Gibraltar Strait,
> the Red Sea, and the Gulf. The Arab portion of that region
> is also simmering with a popular notion of unity and
> desire for full sovereignty spanning northern Africa and
> western Asia. It is where the Palestinian struggle anchors
> a populist anti-colonial sentiment, and where imposed
> proxy regimes are dependent in their existence directly on
> the U.S. In the heart of that region, there is Israel, the
> U.S.'s most important ally and power broker, functioning
> as a spearhead that simultaneously requires a political,
> economic and diplomatic cover and support from the U.S.
>
> Absolute control - military control - over these highly
> strategic resources is the key to the exercise of hegemony
> in the world capitalist economy. If the United States were
> to leave, Japan, Germany, Britain, France would be quick
> to attempt to fill the void. Therefore, Bush does not
> contemplate withdrawing from Iraq as an option, nor would
> it be a considered option if Kerry replaces Bush in
> November.
>
> The Bush gang opted to use naked military force as a means
> of further consolidating an existing U.S. dictatorship
> over the region. The project in Iraq was designed not only
> to crush the Iraqi government, it was seen as a means to a
> larger end. The plan was to build large-scale U.S.
> military bases in Iraq, establish in Baghdad the largest
> U.S. embassy (more than 3,000 personnel) in the world, and
> use Iraq as the launching pad for regime change throughout
> the region - the imposition of a true Pax Americana.
> Earlier U.S. governments, including the Clinton
> administration, also declared regime change in Iraq as the
> top priority in U.S-Iraq relations. The Bush
> administration, however, saw Iraq in a different light:
> that the conquest and takeover of Iraq would be used as a
> strategic pivot for the long-term reorganization and
> globalization of this region under U.S. authority.
>
> This was not the first time the U.S. has utilized Iraq for
> this purpose. In 1955, the Baghdad Pact was orchestrated
> by Britain and the U.S. as a response to the emergence of
> the non-aligned movement that was established in Bandung,
> Indonesia by decolonizing movements and nations. The Iraqi
> people have never accepted that they should be pawns in
> someone else's geo-strategic chess board. They have always
> resisted colonialism.
>
> Tens of thousands of Iraqis have died already as their
> country was invaded and occupied. It is clear from the
> events of the recent days that so many Iraqis are enraged
> and disgusted with the occupation of their country that
> thousands and thousands of people are prepared to give
> their life rather than accept foreign domination.
>
> The Iraqis are paying with their lives rather than be
> colonial subjects. Meanwhile, the young men and women of
> the foreign occupying forces, including U.S. troops,
> really just want to go home. They and their families know
> that contrary to the assertions of Rumsfeld, the U.S.
> forces are not considered liberators by the people. This
> is the classic equation for an unwinnable imperialist war.
> In this sense too, the conflict resembles Vietnam. The
> Vietnamese people were prepared to endure immeasurable
> sacrifice to reclaim control over the country against
> foreign occupying forces that, in turn, only wanted only
> to return to their families in one piece.
>
> In the recent days, the U.S. media establishment has been
> filled with analysis and stories reflecting the grave
> concern within the political establishment that Bush's
> Iraq design may be creating the biggest crisis for U.S.
> imperialism since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The
> actions of Bush and Rumsfeld have catalyzed a revolt that
> is moving from an embryonic stage to a potential
> full-scale rebellion. Unable to prevent the spread of the
> rebellion by other means, the U.S. military is carrying
> out more murderous repression against the people, which in
> turn will inflame the situation in Iraq and throughout the
> region. Under these conditions, there is no actual exit or
> withdrawal strategy in site. Even should the U.S. succeed
> in outsourcing the occupation authority from Paul Bremmer
> to his hand picked Iraqi proxies, there will be no actual
> exit of U.S. military forces from Iraq.
>
> Even the phony exit strategy is collapsing as the Pentagon
> brass ponders the current need, like General Westmoreland
> did 1967, to send thousands of additional troops to crush
> a rebellion that has its roots in the anti-colonial
> yearnings of an occupied people. Rumsfeld has said
> publicly that he is considering sending additional troops
> to Iraq. The Pentagon has relied not only on the
> 120,000-plus U.S. military forces but, according to
> Nightline on April 6, an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 "guns
> for hire" - U.S., British and South African mercenaries -
> that are now fighting in Iraq under the euphemistic label
> "private contractors."
>
> The people of the world, including the people of the U.S.,
> created an unprecedented mass movement in the last 18
> months opposing Bush's war and subsequent occupation of
> Iraq. At this critical time it is urgent to take to the
> streets in emergency mobilizations to demand: U.S. Out of
> Iraq; Bring the Troops Home Now; Money for jobs, education
> and healthcare - Not for wars of aggression.
>
> From Friday April 9 through Monday April 12 there will be
> nationally-coordinated emergency local demonstrations in
> cities and towns throughout the country. Organize an
> action in your local area. To list your local action on
> the website and in future emails, fill out the easy-to-use
> form at
> http://www.internationalanswer.org/campaigns/a10/event.html
>
> NEW YORK CITY
> Friday, April 9
> 4:30 pm
> Times Square
> 212-633-6646
>
> WASHINGTON DC
> Saturday, April 10
> 12 noon
> White House (Lafayette Park)
> 202-544-3389
>
> LOS ANGELES
> Friday, April 9
> 5 pm
> Westwood Federal Building (Wilshire & Veteran)
> 213-487-2368
>
> SAN FRANCISCO
> Saturday, April 10
> 12 noon
> UN Plaza (Market St. between 7th St. and Hyde. Civic
> Center BART)
> 415-821-6545
>
> Downloadable flyers, other literature and more can be
> found at:
> http://www.internationalanswer.org/campaigns/a10/index.html
>
> LIST YOUR LOCAL ACTION:
> Fill out the easy-to-use form at
> http://www.internationalanswer.org/campaigns/a10/event.html
> to list your city's or campus's event! A list of national
> actions will be available soon.
>
> --------------------------
>
> A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition
> Act Now to Stop War & End Racism
>
> FOR MORE INFORMATION:
> http://www.InternationalANSWER.org
> info@internationalanswer.org
> New York 212-633-6646
> Washington 202-544-3389
> Los Angeles 213-487-2368
> San Francisco 415-821-6545
>
> Sign up to receive updates (low volume):
> http://www.internationalanswer.org/subscribelist.html
>
> To make a tax-deductible donation, go to
> http://www.internationalanswer.org/donate.html
> _______________________________________________
> ANSWER.general mailing list
>
> Anyone can subscribe.
> Send an email request to:
> mailto:ANSWER.general-subscribe@organizerweb.com
>
> To unsubscribe mailto:ANSWER.general-unsubscribe@organizerweb.com
>
> Subscribing and unsubscribing can also be done on the Web at
> http://www.organizerweb.com/mailman/listinfo/answer.general