Bush Esta Comprometido por
la Mossad?
por B. Ehkstruh Sunday, Nov. 14, 2004 at 4:57
PM
Los datos estan aqui:
(en Ingles) Does Ariel Sharon, the suspected war criminal from
the country that gave refuge to mob financier Meyer Lansky for years, have Bush
by the balls?
First read Barbara Honegger’s article: http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/911PI_The%20US%20Government,%20Not%20the%20Hijackers,%20'Chose'%20the%20Date%20of%20the%209-11%20Attacks.htm
Honegger shows that 9-11 appears to have been a date scheduled for a
government exercize to do a mock drill as though hijacked jets were about to be
flown into skyscrapers, including the twin towers. Honegger quotes news articles
and government insiders. Honegger notes that Dick Cheney was irate about the
leak of memos showing that a drill was planned for 9-11-01. 9-11 mastermind
Khaled Sheik Mohammed sent a note to Mohammed Atta to initiate the attacks,
which said: “The Match is about to begin. Tomorrow (9-11) is zero hour.”
In other words, Bin Laden didn’t decide on the 9-11 date on his own.
Somehow, he found out that a drill was planned on that date, which meant that
his first attack wouldn’t cause alarm. After all, it was all a drill, right?
Which may be why, in Michael Moore’s movie, Bush doesn’t even frown when he’s
told, on-camera, that a jet has just crashed into the first tower. Bush just
smiles and continues reading a book to the children.
But how would Bin
Laden have gotten wind of the drill? The answer lies in the murky world of
Mossad intelligence. Years ago, in a case made famous by investigative
journalist Danny Casalaro, a company called Inslaw got control of what is known
as PROMIS software, a platform that can penetrate other electronic software with
ease. It penetrates banks, computers, government networks and more to read
electronic messages. During the Reagan years, Casalaro was found dead, a
suspected murder possibly staged as a suicide, after US intelligence did a kind
of hostile takeover of the PROMIS enterprise.
Of course, Israel
reportedly got its hands on PROMIS and then, according to various reports,
proceeded to sell it to Islamic enemies, possibly including Bin Laden—after
installing a back door that allowed Mossad spies to easily monitor Arab enemies
who used it. Remember those Israeli “moving company” employees arrested after
cheering the burning, falling twin towers from a van rooftop just across the
river, in New Jersey? The Mossad had the easy ability to monitor Bin Laden’s use
of PROMIS to first find out about, then plan hijack attacks that coincided with
a US drill of the sort. 9-11 may not have been a surpise to Ariel Sharon.
Instead, long before the twin towers went down, Sharon’s Mossad was doing its
homework, both on Bin Laden, and on Bush, of course.
Apparently, Mossad
was onto Bin Laden, i.e. the Mossad agents who lived “next door” to leading
attacker and pilot Mohammed Atta, according to journalist Daniel Hopsicker.
Barbara Honegger calls the 9-11 coincidence the “Match strategy,” as is
suggested by the message that got Dick Cheney so bizarrely riled. But why would
such evidence rile Dick Cheney?
According to Hopsicker, there is more to
the story. See Hopsicker’s article: http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/archive/scoop/stories/b1/e9/200407271312.de441eb7.html
Not only did Bin Laden apparently penetrate US defense and intelligence with
PROMIS software that the Israelis reportedly sold to Bin Laden. There is deeply
embarrassing dirt in the mix. Surrounding Mohammed Atta’s stay in cozy, quiet
Venice, Florida, where he trained to fly airliners, was a bizarre web of
narcotics dealing and US intelligence corruption.
Hopsicker’s various
witnesses note that 43 pounds of heroin was seized by police at the same Venice
FL airport where Atta trained at, back in 2000. The heroin was found in a Lear
jet owned by the owner of Huffman Aviation, the airport site where Atta trained
to fly big jets. Hopsicker’s informants say the DEA gave the green light for
narcotics trafficking out of Huffman at the time Atta trained just a stone’s
throw away. But why would the DEA allow that to go on?
Because, as
Hopsicker shows, Atta had long been followed by US intelligence. More
importantly, at the time, Bin Laden effectively owned and controlled the
government of Afghanistan, which produced between 70-90 percent of the world’s
opium, of which heroin is made. US intelligence and right wing money men
certainly get in on such cash flows. Read A. J. McCoy's The Politics of Heroin
in Southeast Asia, or see Gary Webb’s book, Dark Alliance, for the details.
So, Bin Laden, the son of a billionaire, had control of the world’s most
lucrative, most high profit cash crop. In the world of easy money, there is no
other comparison, except for cocaine. Al Queda and Bin Laden are highly skilled
at laundering huge amounts of money through such trade, also at earning a
life-sustaining profit for their terror network. Bombs and weapons are not free,
after all. By controlling Afghanistan, then headed by an illiterate, one-eyed
sheik named Mullah Omar, Bin Laden could penetrate and do business with a huge
variety of US organized crime and intelligence structures.
Remember
Sibel Edmonds, that FBI translator who said she’d seen FBI messages showing that
the FBI knew of a plan to fly jets into US skyscrapers shortly before 9-11?
Bush’s FBI has placed a gag order on Sibel Edmonds, but she has nonetheless gone
public with important details. As Daniel Hopsicker reports,
"FBI
whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds, in the months after the attack, bumped into the
arms for drugs deals, she said in a recent interview with http://www.BreakFornews.com. Edmonds
alleged that the US State Department blocked investigations showing links
between criminal drug trafficking networks and the terror attacks on 9/11.
"Certain investigations were being quashed, let's say per State
Department's request, because it would have affected certain foreign relations
[or] affected certain business relations with foreign organizations," she
stated."
So why would Bush fear what Edmonds has to say? Because of the
fact that US intelligence clearly tracked Atta and other terrorists who were
flocking to flight schools in the US. Bin Laden was big in the dope business,
which was good for Bush crony banks. Bush should know: his father headed the CIA
back when Meyer Lansky and the mob were big money earners, money that was
sometimes laundered into US black budget programs.
When Zacharias
Moussaoui was arrested in Minneapolis only months before 9-11, FBI agent Cowleen
Rowley tried to get FBI permission to look at his computer laptop hard drive.
Rowley’s FBI supervisor said, no way. So, Moussaoui, who was a close friend of
Mohammed Atta and apparently in on the 9-11 scheme, kept his secrets. Reporter
Daniel Hopsicker interviewed the man who drove Mohammed Atta around in a cab in
Venice Fl during the months Atta trained there. The cab driver reports seeing
Moussaoui in the mix. Apparently, Bush’s FBI may have been warned off by DEA or
by the CIA because of Al Queda dope implications. Now how would that look on
Bush’s resume during an election year? Terrible, which is why Bush’s FBI later
actually PAID A BONUS to the FBI supervisor who told Cowleen Rowley to back off
and leave the laptop alone.
So, what would Ariel Sharon have on George
Bush? The PROMIS scandal, the Mohammed Atta dope and Bin Laden heroin pipeline,
the various reported implications of Richard Armitage in heroin trafficking, and
more. Who’s Richard Armitage? Armitage is Bush’s Undersecretary of State, a
reddish haired weightlifter gone overweight (like Ariel Sharon) who was at the
center of what was described as “a war” within the elder Bush’s administration
to get rid of Armitage because of his heroin connections. According to Daniel
Sheehan, Ross Perot, Bo Greitz and numerous others (including a CIA agent I
interviewed), during the 1970’s Armitage headed the Far East company, which
laundered Golden Triangle heroin in Thailand toward the end of the CIA’s heroin
doings during the Vietnam war.
What else would Sharon have on Bush?
Bush’s father, as head of the CIA, tried his best to divert attention from CIA
corruption during his brief tenure there. Bush Sr. didn’t just kiss the rump of
white collar and organized crime bound into the CIA; he tried to lick it clean
by denying everything. Like the famous J. Edgar Hoover memo (see The Nation
magazine article of 1988) of 1963 saying that, when Hoover asked if the CIA had
evidence of its ties to Lee Harvey Oswald, a “George H. W. Bush” responded for
the CIA, saying no. Of course, we now have abundant evidence, including the
testimony of CIA officer David Atlee Phillips, that Oswald had deep interactions
with the CIA.
Sharon’s right wing cohorts at Mossad would certainly have
found mob financier Meyer Lansky’s comments interesting during the Nixon years
that Lansky spent in Israel, hiding from US lawmen. Dope on Bush there? Maybe
not Bush Jr., but…
Stanley Hilton, Bob Dole’s former senior advisor and
Wolfowitz’s college classmate, said that he sees evidence for Bush
administration awareness of 9-11 attack plans on the Alex Jones radio show
recently. Hilton sees a conspiracy, although he doesn’t seem to have heard
Barbara Honegger’s info about “the Match strategy,” so Hilton’s interpretation
of the facts appears to be exaggerated.
Finally, Bush’s stark, if not
fateful veering away from previous presidents’ attempts to further the peace
process in Israel suggests that Sharon’s Mossad may have compromised Bush. Bin
Laden specifically cited Bush and Rumsfeld’s cheerleading for Sharon’s savaging
of the Palestinians and the Palestinian Authority as motive for the 9-11 attack.
That much is public knowledge.
Analysts seem bewildered by Bush’s
willingness to lie to the entire world about weapons of mass destruction, then
threaten major allies France AND Germany with brutal consequences if they didn’t
go along with Bush’s scheme for an unprovoked attack on Iraq. Bush’s officials
told Germany that it would suffer the consequences and no longer be a major
power if it didn’t join in the war. Bush’s cronies still pillory France daily.
Even Kerry looks “French,” remember?
Some observers go so far as to
suggest that Bush is controlled by Sharon and Israel---which may be a stretch.
But there is certainly evidence that Bush may have been compromised in
unprecedented ways, by the Israelis. A few weeks ago, Bush made the nearly
hallucinatory remark that Afghanistan and Iraq are well on their way to being
good examples for “a remaking” of the entire Middle East by Bush’s soldiers.
Afghanistan, which has re-surged to be the world’s #1 opium/heroin source--where
the president is little more than the mayor of Kabul--is an example? And Iraq?
Richard Perle, former Bush Pentagon advisor, and accused spy Larry Franklin are
but two of Bush’s officials long suspected of slipping classified info to the
Israelis.
Hints by Bush officials that a number of other mideastern
countries are on Bush’s list of to-do’s further underscore Bush’s historically
weak, if not compromised position re the regime of Sharon, the suspected war
criminal.
Previous presidents acted with dignity and courage to further
the peace process in Israel, but Bush Jr. has capitulated entirely, only making
occasional statements, but never enforcing them. This is a fast-developing
subject, also a controversial one. Bush may be secretly compromised—in ways that
are of epic importance.
By the way, where was Bush during his lost year
at the tail end of his Guard obligation? Did he make any extra-curricular
journeys into his father's old CIA-related haunts: Central and South America?
Read Hopsicker's article on this fast-developing possibility at: http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0402/S00236.htm
Este mensaje
se envía de acuerdo con la nueva legislación sobre correo electrónico: Por
sección 301, párrafo (a)(2)(C) de S. 1618 Bajo el decreto S.1618 titulo 3ro.
Aprobado por el 105 Congreso base de las normativas internacionales sobre SPAM,
este E-mail no podrá ser considerado SPAM mientras incluya una forma de ser
removido. Para ser removido incluya en el Asunto
BORRAR
|