[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OGM:pressione consumatori funziona
Cari tutti,
un articolo che dimostra come la pressione dei consumatori per la
separazione di filiera sta agendo sul mercato.
Vi e' un crescente orientamento a richiedere la separazione del mais
transgenico da parte del mercato.
Spero interessi,
Alessandro Gimona
CORN GROWER ELEVATOR SURVEY SHOWS STRONG DEMAND FOR
FARMER SEGREGATION
October 5, 2000
American Corn Growers Foundation
http://www.acga.org
WASHINGTON, -- As part of the Farmer Choice-Customer First, a
written,
developed and funded program of the American Corn Growers
Foundation
(ACGF), the second annual survey of grain elevators has been
completed
showing a sizeable majority of grain elevators either requiring
or
suggesting the segregation of genetically modified (GMO) corn
from non-GMO
corn.
1,107 grain elevators in nine states were surveyed. 338
elevators or 30.5%
are either requiring or suggesting segregation at their
elevator gate and
461 elevators, or 41.6% are either requiring or suggesting
farmers undertake
on-farm segregation before delivery of their corn. Taken
together, 72.1% of
grain elevators are either requiring or suggesting segregation
at the
elevator or on the farm. Responses from other questions on the
survey show
244
elevators or 22% are providing premiums for non-GMO corn, with
the range
being from 10 to 35 cents. "As more and more foreign and
domestic customers
are demanding the labeling of corn shipments, these high number
of elevators
either demanding or suggesting segregation are not surprising,"
said Gale
Lush, a corn producer from Wilcox, Nebraska and the Chairman of
the American
Corn Growers Foundation.
Segregation is one of the major concerns to U.S. farmers
surrounding the
entire issue of GMO products. In a survey commissioned by the
ACGF in May of
this year, 76% of farmers said they would be less likely to
plant GMOs in
the future if the burden for segregation fell on them. With
41.6% of the
elevators either requiring or suggesting that their
farmer-customer
segregate on the farm, this does not bode well for the
proliferation of
agricultural biotechnology.
The demands of on-farm segregation will add additional costs to
production
agriculture, including a loss of efficiency and the expense of
testing and
certification. Couple this burden with the uncertainty of loss
of markets,
legal liability and corporate concentration, farmers will need
to think long
and hard before making their planting intentions for next
year," added
Dennis Mitchell, a member of the ACGF Board of Directors and a
corn grower
from Houghton, South Dakota.
"It is very possible that the United States could see a bigger
drop in GMO
planted corn acres next year then the 20.4% drop exhibited this
past year,"
concluded Gary Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer of the ACGF.
Elevators surveyed were located in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas,
Missouri, Minnesota, Ohio, Nebraska and South Dakota. Indiana,
Kansas and
Ohio were added this year.
The American Corn Growers Foundation, neutral on the issue of
agricultural
biotechnology, developed Farmer Choice-Customer First as an
educational
program geared towards providing unbiased, honest and objective
information to production agriculture on the subject of
genetically modified crop products.
Alessandro Gimona
agimona@libero.it