[Prec. per data] [Succ. per data] [Prec. per argomento] [Succ. per argomento] [Indice per data] [Indice per argomento]
Environment Protection.
- Subject: Environment Protection.
- From: "a\.ceresa2002" <a.ceresa2002 at libero.it>
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:06:31 +0200
- Disposition-notification-to: "a\.ceresa2002" <a.ceresa2002 at libero.it>
Italy, Milan, 20 August 2004. RE: ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND LOSTED HUMAN LIVES. Most respectful Colleague, Every century is to be dedicated to a particular discovery that marks the human progress. Last century on the contrary, amongst the many respectable discoveries that have improved our quality of life, one is still dominating negatively world human life, jeopardising our vital natural means of survival. For that reason I am of the opinion present century is to be dedicated to World Politicians that have discovered a new enthusiastic function named "Environment Protection" as a mean to defend a previous very bad programmed mistake supporting the uncontrolled use of combustibles that have destroied the planet. It is a fact that pollution released by combustibles substances is the major direct responsible for world negative unusual natural events, encreasing human suffering with deseases, allergies, cancers, etc. and further, also responsible to encrease Nations Sanitarian expenses to the benefit of Pharmaceuticals Industries and some politicians. Mineral oil should reach the cost of 100 USA Dollars the barrel, to start for consideration of more reliable solutions. "The Environment Protection" seams a quick passive solution to all our suffering, without ever mentioning a program to reduce main causes of world damages. For the purpose have been created: Environment Ministryes, Environment Organizations and groups of researchers all supported by world tax payers, but results are far away. I am not surprized if very shortly someone comes up with convincing ideas that pollution is good for the lungs, mutch better for the blood, the eyes, the skin, etc. and even harvesting and vegetables benefit of pollution marvellous merits. To obtain major polluting benefits, dissove few pills twice a day in a jar of beer, wine or strong staff. The cost shall be a ridiculous ten dollars per day for each person multiplied by 6 billions peoples, referring to overall population of the planet. To our eyes the problem appears more simple, "stop at once marketing combustibles substances", but for mayor global interests the matter is obviously more complicated. Combustibles are important referent for international wars. Giving up combustibles means reducing armaments, reducing Pharmaceutical consums, and socialize with world peoples. A young boy once asked to his father: Daddy ! Way in major towns buildings look like blackened by smoke and many people wear protection masks to breath ?? Further, way people are increasengly affected by cancer and other allergic deseases ?? The father stund paralyzed for a while and then replied: Dear son, the solution sound simple but is off our control. It depend mostly from high interests managed by Governments and do not consider how many people will live or die as a consequence of major reason that affect our lives !! Peoples have been instructed since very young to pray, to be good, to forgive wickedness, and to free politicians from observing regulations and prosecutions. But daddy, if they allow me to espress my opinion in the next international symposium, I would use all my energies to make them understand that we should be more serious on the matter that have already reached very critical consequences, damaging all our vital means of subsistance. How many of as, are on the side of the young boy, but democratically speaking is nothing we can do against Governments Programs substaining Globalization interests. Many uncompetent authorities push to promote Hydrogen as the appropriated Energy for the future, but looking facts on the correct dimension, we shall discover that Hydrogen is an extremely dangerous combustible, it suits better for terroristic actions and further, its cost is not competitive at all. When I read about international symposium relative to "Environment Problems Solutions", I hope does not concerns solutions sustaining "Mineral Oil, Gas or any Chemical Concoction" that have polluted the world to very critical consequences and caused so many wars. I also hope the reason of frequent symposium are not directed to convince people to approve the Nuclear Power, of which, the main problem relays on the "Radioactive Waste", responsible for so many losted lives and still harming humanity for very long periods of time, with large quantities of Waste Disposal at International levels, without a defined secure location. As you can note from world encreasing demand of Energy, major interests pivot around the production of Electric Power, that at present is mainly generated by mean of combustibles. I remember years ago at the boom of Nuclear Plants, when particular specific interest have engaged well known scientists to advertise for the Atom Energy as the unequivocable best and more convenient solution for world supply of Energy. At that time they forgot to consider the Environment Protection, otherwise all projects relative to Nuclear Plants would have been turned off. At later date, the same scientists confirmed that Nuclear Energy has been a very bad solution and now the world is pressed by huge quantities of harming Nuclear Waste without a safe destination. Even seas have been largely infected with Nuclear Waste. Presently on the market there are multiple positive and negative solutions producing energy, with conventional or alternative ideas, but examining each one with deep consideration for the Environment Protection, our selection reduces to only number two favourable solutions: 1 WATER FALLS ENERGY PLANTS that are nearly all exploited and cannot resolve the encreaing demand for Energy. 2 GRAVITY ENERGY EXPLOITMENT PLANTS to produce cheap clean Electric Power, and at night re-charge water dams to multiply the capacity and efficiency of water falls systems reservoirs. Other systems are to be turned down for various reasons: some for low efficiency, high costs, non dependable, environment problems, limited performance, noisiness of Aeolian Plants, great extension of land for Sun Plants, damaging flora and fauna of the area, creating deserts. Gravity Energy is a natural gift, is illimited and continuous, further, it is pure, free pollution and free cost. The trend of the discovery exploiting Gravity Energy, relays on the fact that it saves the cost of combustibles and relative damages caused by pollution to the environment and to human beings. The Cheap Generation of Electric Power could be also favourable to develop Desalinating Plants for all countries with low availability of sweet water facilities. Valuable economical results can be also obtained with the application of above Gravity Units to local transports, such as: electrification of city tramcar, city buses, electric trains and vehicles development in general. I am available for further discussion if needed. E-mail: a.ceresa2002 at libero.it
- Prev by Date: Zimbabwe to ban rights groups
- Next by Date: Per Sinti e Rom c'è posto solo tra la spazzatura e l'autostrada?
- Previous by thread: Zimbabwe to ban rights groups
- Next by thread: Per Sinti e Rom c'è posto solo tra la spazzatura e l'autostrada?
- Indice: